>once you allow a person in, you CANNOT restrict his free speech
This is correct.
They can however kick you out for terms of service violations
Unrelated to Free Speech.
Now what?
>once you allow a person in, you CANNOT restrict his free speech
This is correct.
They can however kick you out for terms of service violations
Unrelated to Free Speech.
Now what?
>The terms and rulz must be applied to all equitably.
5 cars going 80 down the highway.
1 gets pulled over and given a speeding ticket
Will the But the other 4 got away with it defense work?
We need IBOR.
Internet laws that must be followed by every entity operating on the medium.
It sucks that the only way to stop them right now
is via the heavy hand of the executive branch like you say.
In order to beat them in court you have to have
squeeky clean twats/tried every other possible remedy/proof of others getting away with same violations and @Jack doing nothing
Average Joe 6-pack ain't spending 6 figs fighting that shit
IBOR the easiest way to fix.
Public outrage and refusal to use app next best but that's like herding cats.
Monopoly break-up another alternative but (you) can't do that only DOJ can start that.
Enjoy it while it lasts.
I'm sure inflation and the local taxman will have it up to $18.04 in no time.
ZH Guest Post by Kunstler
Grumpy old man had to take a dig at us,
but at least he's one of the few that even know who Huber is.
POTUS better not invite him in for a photo op
like Adams & Lionel
or this board will melt down.
ZH article in the Notables
was nice that it's about Huber
But not nice to us