dChan
Anonymous ID: eb4033 Aug. 27, 2018, 2:07 p.m. No.2757190   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7199 >>7225 >>7247 >>7258 >>7275 >>7282 >>7321 >>7332 >>7345

Anons,

 

Breads 3475, 3476, 3477 seem shilled work to me. Please re check if time.

 

In bread 3475 many muh jew shills were there, 3476 was then named JQ (Jewish question) by the baker! Baker refused to rename and made shilly AF muh jews comments himself.

 

'Research' then was mostly much muh jew shilling.

 

One 'anon' called it even 'JQ Movement'....so far never heard of, thought it was about Q, unity and freedom...

 

This looks licke fuggery bigtime!!

 

See something. Say something.

 

>>2752122

>>2752331

>>2752410

>>2752530

 

Shilly Baker:

>>2751951

>>2752175

>>2752713

>>2752739

Anonymous ID: eb4033 Aug. 27, 2018, 2:15 p.m. No.2757247   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2757199

>>2757190

 

>>2752739

 

Great Baker said many shilly things. So far I have not seen to many Bakers offending anons by calling them Jew - meant as offense.

 

THE ONES WHO DIVIDE ARE NOT WITH US.

 

Anons are smarter than that.

 

WWG1WGA!

Anonymous ID: eb4033 Aug. 27, 2018, 2:24 p.m. No.2757332   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7345 >>7349 >>7360

>>2757275

Wrong.

 

A Baker pushing for simplifiying and dividing shill stuff is not ok.

Bread named JQ, not ok, NOT SMART.

Making shilly (muh you are a jew, go read talmud) is certainly not ok for a Baker!

 

The ones who divide are not with us.

Seem to be many 'anons' right now…as past breads.

 

Divide they try. FAIL they will.

 

WWG1WGA!

 

>>2757190