WATCHDOG SUES PENTAGON ON BEHALF OF WHISTLEBLOWER WHO QUESTIONED CONTRACTS TO ‘SPYGATE’ FIGURE
https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/20/judicial-watch-sues-pentagon/
WATCHDOG SUES PENTAGON ON BEHALF OF WHISTLEBLOWER WHO QUESTIONED CONTRACTS TO ‘SPYGATE’ FIGURE
https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/20/judicial-watch-sues-pentagon/
SoyAnon here, my wife's boyfriend got her a Q tattoo. How awesome is that?
RR telling the truth?
Was Ohr working for the C_A at the same time?
Rosenstein was Ohr’s boss previous to his demotion, but Rosenstein claims he knew nothing of Ohr’s involvement within the Russia investigation. Rosenstein declared to Congress in a letter reviewed by Solomon that he was “unaware of Ohr’s activities with Steele,” that Ohr was “not assigned” to the Russia investigation, and that Ohr “was not in the chain of command.” Rosenstein added, “Any involvement Mr. Ohr had in this matter was without my knowledge.”
Solomon’s reporting is in line with Rosenstein’s congressional testimony. On June 28, Rosenstein informed the Home Judiciary Committee that “Ohr was never working to my knowledge on that Russian investigation.” He reiterated the purpose a second time, saying, “To my knowledge he wasn’t working on the Russian matter.”
https://verifiedtasks.com/how-bruce-ohr-could-implicate-high-ranking-obama-officials-in-spygate/
Sally Yates not RR assigned Bruce Ohr
Steele wrote to Ohr on July 1, 2016: “There is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!”
The day after Yate’s firing, Steele contacted Ohr, texting “doubtless a sad and crazy day for you re-SY,” a transparent reference to Sally Yates. “Just wanted to check you are OK, still in situ and able to help locally as discussed, along with your Bureau colleagues,” Steele added. Then, after Ohr confirmed “I’m still here and able to help as discussed,” Steele confused that if Ohr was out at DOJ, he wanted one other “(Bureau?)” contact.
Sally Yates signed the FISA
Ever wonder if RR was there to keep the evidence?