>>2758106 Q post
couple interesting things right from the start regarding the SaraC article.
>>The retaliation for whistleblowing was something Bigley expected. “So, we weren’t surprised when DoD bureaucrats moved shortly thereafter to strip >>Mr. Lovinger of both his security clearance and his detail to the National Security Council,
where he had been Senior Director for Strategy as a by-name request of the incoming Trump Administration,” said the attorney.
So Lovinger was requested BY NAME by the INCOMING DJT administration. How would POTUS know who was good or bad in a house of flies?
Enter Michael Flynn, who was setting up a list of patriots long before the election was over.
>>“Yet, we were puzzled by the
unprecedented ferocity of efforts to discredit Mr. Lovinger, including leaks from DoD of false and defamatory
>>information to the press,” he said. “Our assumption was that the other contractor about whom Mr. Lovinger explicitly raised concerns – a close >>confidante of Hillary Clinton
The reason for the leaks could be one of many, and probably multiple. but that's not what Q asked.
>>Who is systematically arranging the leaks to select individuals? -Q
>>Why is this important [to drop] prior to BO testimony?-Q
Who was the head of the DoD at the time?
Who were the top directors at the time?
We know the top brass from multiple agencies were corrupt. Easiest path is to start here and work our way down the chain of command to Halper
THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE.
NOW THEY ALL LOSE.
Q+