>>2758706 (Q, pb)
>6. F_ASSETS
a. Financial
b. Foreign
c. Foundation
d. All of the above
Am I months behind? No. Though I am questioning what I saw here as theories:
>>2758610 (pb, #3484 notable) Anons' answers so far to Q's last drop
The only one making sense to me was >>2758150 (PB) People working in concert with Q.
Only added the details as I see fit. Review review review.
Highly possible that no name fell victim as a result of this. Also possible that the [19] has become [30], admittedly I may be reaching on that one.
>perjury trap
PRECISELY what I wan thinking anon, the timing of Sara dropping this is too well coordinated. Forces BO to tomorrow either a. tell the truth, or b. commit perjury. Win-win, that's Q+'s style all the way.
https://www.resignation.info/
Agreed (context of those handling classified intel). Context also pointed to CF & MI foundations, so the other two came to mind as well.
Is that what you got out of that? Obviously Nunes is plays a huge part in the plan. However he's not in it all alone. Nunes+ being given a leg up via the article released today is not out of the question. see: >>2760797, of course they knew. Now, the public knows. That helps. As for Nunes knowing more than Q, well, It's interesting, yet neither of us can prove it or disprove it. So I'll leave that at that.
I've been tired of Q worship since it became a thing. That's never been what this is about. As far as intel goes, my dad used to say "I take all knowledge & use it to benefit myself, I don't care who said it." That's where I stand with it.
<thinks [HRC] in a killbox means that she's free
>>2760982 Translation?: GOD WINS