>>2764701
>>465919 (pb ) Q post #809
>Clowns revealed in China/other.
>2010.
>[187]
>Sold intel?
>HRC open source server?
>[Missing emails]
>[CrowdStrike]
>Granted access.
>Betrayed.
>Only the tip.
>This will be made public [soon].
>Q
Combining these two posts, here's one theory:
We know China 187'd CIA assets who were revealed.
We now know that a Chinese firm got into Hillary's server early and got almost all of her emails.
What if the CIA assets were the ones who hacked Hillary's server? Or really, they were granted access by CrowdStrike, for a fee of course?
Then CrowdStrike betrays and sells the CIA out to China, and the CIA assets are killed to wrap up loose ends that know HRCs email secrets (including selling Intel to the Chinese).
Hillary makes money. CrowdStrike makes money. China gets secrets. China purges CIA loose ends that helped get them secrets (which were already being sold by HRC to China anyway).
Not sure the above is correct, but I feel like there is something related between the Ghomert news and this previous Q post.