>>2764886 (pb) notable
>>2764886 (pb) notable
What I want to write is probably not in line with what we are supposed to focus on or what everyone is looking at now?
but I want to get this down, for the record.
It tangentially relates to the 9/11 Guantanamo trials judge "retirement"
And maybe related to the fate of Hussain , as is the relationship of President Donald Trump to the present chief of Kenya, a political rival of the person whom Hussain called his Dad.
Under Federal Law, as I was given a citation of it by a friend Judge who told me "don't tell anyone I gave you this" :
To take away citizens rights under "color of law" is a capital crime. Obviously a Judge and Jury would interpret that according to circumstances and maybe sometimes give a fine or jail-time rather than the death penalty?
Yes, I read it correctly.
Consider this:
Bills of Rights : Right to Bear Arms.
All these staged shootings [GLADIO] ostensibly for Propaganda purposes?
But what if the purpose of the Propaganda was to take away a right the colonists had bestowed on their descendants as a barter to join the Federal Government?
Their little amateur "school plays" are then much more serious?
That makes their little game, including 9/11,, much more serious than simple "Propaganda?" Even if no one died in any of these "events" ~ which is debatable since the deaths were never proved
(though for people who trust MSM and have not studied it, that would seem so outlandish as to beg belief)
Is the counter-Propaganda which promotes the idea no one died [Sandy Hook, many others - there are questions about who actually died - since many of the featured players are just that, actors, bolstered by liars] Is that notion another "insurance policy" in case they are caught?
"Oh it was just for Propaganda" would be their cover? they could trot out all the actors we've known of, all this time?
(The deception by the Mass Media, for government Propaganda purposes] was actually made officially legal during Hussain's tenure
It seems like their NWO plan has run out of time
with the election of POTUS. Their pushed agenda to take away guns [or to sell them and create civil war] is a capital crime since the intention was to take away the right to bear arms, under color of law. The fomenting of a Civil War would have what as it's intention? Taking away all of our right.
Notice the red paint. Pic related.