>>2767385 Beyond the literal translation, TREASON is the betrayal of one's family, nation & God. It is also the betrayal of the past, present & future.
>>2766759 lb
Thank you co-diggers >>2767295 , >>2767107 , >>2766812
Reposting search terms received from informant in pb night of August 27, 2018.
I presume the "non-text" strings may be cryptographic authentications. They don't resolve in a search engine (not that I expected they would).
-----0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-----
Anonymous 08/27/18 (Mon) 21:37:32 099e68 (1) No.2761603 >>2761805
ROBERT MERCER.
FOLLOW.
3S<r5_=;.U[06|P<xCSgf.^$.nw5wt<E27L:/ugL+LMg[DUbZbS$4"p+s?:RENAISSANCE TECH. MERCER. BANNON. THEIL. BTC. COINBASE. FOLLOW. DoE TIE IN. FIND. [7] ^]I%/<NS?jK:gQ'1:1]IJ-u$x^~a-1,1/k2h7saj!72xSp:Q1gGxyx;tTvI+r!'
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Technologies
RENAISSANCE TECH.
MERCER.
BANNON.
THEIL.
BTC.
COINBASE.
FOLLOW.
DoE TIE IN.
FIND.
[7]
^]I%/<NS?jK:gQ'1:1]IJ-u$x^~a-1,1/k2h7saj!72xSp:Q1gGxyx;tTvI+r!'
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Technologies
MEDALLION FUND.
FOLLOW.
BRADLEY BIRKENFELD.
UBS.
KEY.
ISIS.
PROJECT CASSANDRA
fall of cassandra 2B6DAE482AEDE5BAC99B7D47ABDB3
xX!dx^[FSomOsAQ5sR(+c1-.^g#X9iW!|w'kZP;:^pk$sH?34f5V%]j,@ngsq;Z
SCOTT BENNETT.
YOSSI COHEN.
FOLLOW.
WEINSTEIN.
COINCIDENCE?
m>f*[z^/}lE`|W?@Xi8F{_ayJ=_XNjebQK?yRJ]jqG6FK)C7QPJ=wo'%Vf+y|dB
https:// github.com/ytisf/theZoo
SPECTRE, MELTDOWN AND ZUES ADDED…..
SHOVEL WILL GET HEAVY.
CARRY IT.
GODBLESS.
Manifold Learning
One of the perennial quant guessing games is speculating on RenTech (e.g. see amusing 5-year NP thread), particularly given the fascinating background of Jim Simons (see his arXiv for recent work on differential cohomology). Ignoring public commentary, whose veracity is obviously questionable, careful consideration of historical hiring trends and corresponding employee backgrounds are suggestive. While such speculation is amusing, potential relevance arises in assisting in filtering the exploration of research.
Specifically, several themes are consistent:
Infrastructure / execution: computer scientists speaks to the mundane realities of large-scale offline and online data management, risk management, multi-venue execution, and the usual collection of optimal execution concerns (particularly relevant for liquidity providing and statarb)
Applied mathematics: “natural scientists”, with an emphasis on modern physics (much of which is built upon differential geometry and statistical mechanics), seems reasonable given heavy mathematical and statistical modeling
High dimensionality: analysis and signal generation from high-dimensional spaces, which seems reasonable given many trading problems can elegantly be formulated in such a context; plus a deep well exists of both pure and applied math built by academia over the past 20 years; further, this makes obvious sense given Jim’s academic background (e.g. see Chern-Simons)
Mixing models: RenTech grew through a combination of small acquisitions and internal development, suggesting “the predictive model” (historically referred to as “Basic System”) is not one but rather a collection of heterogeneous models which are dynamically overlaid and mixed; seems reasonable, given market regimes and consistent Medallion performance over the past 20 years
Computational linguistics / NLP: numerous high-profile folks originated from speech recognition, of which numerous advancements over the past 30 years are based upon applied signal processingand statistical information theory (e.g.Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation, by Brown, Pietra, and Mercer); a particularly consistent theme is HMM (going back to the Dragon system by Baker in 1975), which naturally support mixing via HHMM, and causal filtering(see also Berlekamp, who worked with Kelly)
TY SIR.
JOINING THIS SHIT SHOW IS LIKE KNOWING WHO ONE THE BIGGEST PIECE OF SHIT TO MAKE MONEY CONTEST.
GUESS WHAT? i HELPRED.
FUCK IT ALL.
RESTORE THE NORMAL SHIT.
OK FOR REAL. OUT.
jw5^3jK1:FXdyr}sUR2!IsMnRj"4!R>i8u$+_!|A0+6(ED5s]Q<;0KS)ie[qHHs
Just want to inject a pertinent thought…
We will want to also dig what other persons/organizations have the massive data warehouses stuffed with the petabytes of data, and have the processing capability to do this kind of effective prediction.
I can name a few off the top of my head:
→US Dept of Energy (because of the demonstrated need to simulate nuclear explosions, purportedly to avoid the need to test live weapons)
→CERN (because of the massive – I do mean MASSIVE – volumes of data generated by their particle collisions)
→ who else?
5EYS would have the data collection capability. Presumably the ability to warehouse and analylze it.
Who else?
Redefine superpowers as those possessing these data gathering, storing, and analyzing capacities ?
ThankQ co-digger anons.
>>2767461 The black hats are exactly like Captain Ahab: "From hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee."
Likewise they are like cornered like MacBeth, but will play out the string for lack of a better move. "Though Birnham Wood be come to Dunsinane, and thou opposed , being of no woman born, Yet I will try the last."
Anon - research sometimes requires learning stuff, more than a few lines of text can hold. If your mind is too weak for that, then you don't have to visit the new bread >>2767719 Predictive Analytics Dig where a few intelligent diggers will convene.
Only shills belittle the work of higher intellect.
No way to know at this point.
I don't want to speculate.
Mercer (who donated exclusively to consevatives) did leave Ren after making the 2016 political contributions, reportedly over a disagreement with Simons (who donated almost exclusively to Dems/Libs).
Goto Predictive Analytics bread >>2767719
…During the 2016 political campaign cycle Simons contributed $26,277,450 …5th largest individual contributor … >$26M towards liberal candidates
…Robert Mercer contributed $25,059,300 …7th largest individual contributor …all towards conservative candidates.
If that's accurate (source Wikipedia) then they both contributed almost the same amount and Simons was exclusively to dems whereas Mercer's was exclusively to repubs. There was a confusing article a few days ago that summarized "Renaissance Tech" contributions as being almost equal to both candidates and that is true if you aggregate Simons and Mercer. But don't aggregate them! They gave individual contributions, not from the firm, and their political views are apparently opposite.