Your remarks about history being a lie is too vague.. now we're going to have 5000 different theories about history floating around and any attempt to refute anything will be met with "Fake history books!" just like anything that confirms anyone's bias is met with "No coincidences". He needs to get specific quick before the blogosphere looks more like a nuthouse than it already does.
it's not important if there's nothing, aside from super vague references to even more vague theories in their place.
We've got people here now looking at anything with a cross, any eagle, any star for the past 1000 years being all connected.
And all we get to go on is a few symbols by people in power and a factoid from 1700s and a name drop of an order and… no coincidences so everyone who finds anything is right…
We need more than this, especially since none of it is really hitting the (((point)))