>>2776566 (lb)

Is there anyone in DC that thinks public money should: (1) not be wasted, as a general principle; and (2) not be used for the purposes of political warfare, under all circumstances?

Does anyone in DC think that those who have caused, permitted, condoned, or covered up 1 and/or 2 should just skate by without repercussions?

I sense that we, outside DC, are getting mightily pissed off with these scum sucking hacks and want to see some conspicuous examples being made. And very soon.

Cruel and unusual punishment is now AOK by me.

>>2776763

So they lied? Wow. I never would have thought that possible.

Where are the guillotines the DHS purchased for the rest of us now being stored?

>>2776740

I’ll put more money on Mueller being about to indict FLOTUS for egregious acts of beauty on Federal property.

>>2777009

Since her server was unsecured for a few months and then only received kindergarten cyber security thereafter, I’d suggest that the answer to your question is: anyone and everyone, possibly including a guy in Nepal who has no electricity and a grandma from Peoria who got server access while searching for knitting patterns.

>>2777037

That’s a telling argument. I hope it’s used a lot and achieves good effect, anon.

>>2777184

Of all the days to make your debut!!!

Here’s a (YOU)!

>>2777257

Yep. No comparison. Most lawyers are reasonably ethical, which typically would constitute something of a professional handicap for a journo.