Anonymous ID: 694c65 Aug. 28, 2018, 7:50 p.m. No.2777522   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7543 >>7566 >>8013

Charitable institutions (like The Clinton Foundation), as Judge Jeanine Pirro has stated publicly, often serve as a slush fund for those whose name the institution bears.

 

Pirro called the Clintons' foundation nothing more than a money laundering operation used as a slush fund."

 

Like the Clinton Foundation, the McCain Institute is (a tax-exempt, non-profit foundation) with approximately $8.1 million in assets, with disturbingly similar Donors.

 

Since the Clintons are no longer in any position to be able to sell weapons deals, influence, favors, etc for cash…Practically the same corporate donors and some disturbing identical donors are flocking to the McCain Institute.

 

And will likely continue flocking, if Cindy McCain takes her deceased husband's US Senate seat.

 

Disturbing similar Donors:

 

–The Rothschild family

–George Soros

–The Royal Family of Saudi Arabia,etc.

 

Additional Questionable Donors:

 

–OCP, S.A., a Moroccan state-owned phosphate company. Ironically, OCP just happened to also be a "major sponsor" of the Clinton Global Initiative where Bill was a featured speaker.

The Western Sahara holds half of the world’s phosphate reserves. Used to make fertilizer, phosphate is called Morocco’s “white gold.”

 

–The Pivotal Foundation has in the last three years given $205,000 to the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC), which has been a vocal advocate for the Iranian nuclear deal the Obama administration negotiated.

NIAC President Trita Parsi has long been an advocate for Iran, including demanding in May 2017 that President Donald Trump and officials in his administration “cease questioning the integrity of a (nuclear) deal.”

 

This is an extreme conflict of interest. The same tactics as the Clinton Foundation in which foreign governments and foreign interests were throwing a lot of money in the hopes of trying to buy influence, weapons and favors.

 

Foreign governments are forbidden from donating to U.S. politicians and often donate to non-profits in order to gain privileged access to America’s most powerful lawmakers, an arrangement often called “pay-to-play schemes” for lucrative weapons deals.

 

Of course, the real question is just how many congressional representatives have managed to setup similar organizations that we're not even aware of yet.

 

This type of corruption has to end. The United States of America is not for sale to the highest bidder, or sold by corrupt politicians that can masquerade slush funds as non-taxable charities or non-profits.

Anonymous ID: 694c65 Aug. 28, 2018, 7:52 p.m. No.2777553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7638 >>7924 >>8057 >>8158 >>8178

When the money stopped funneling into The Clinton Foundation….(Hillary or Bill no longer have any governmental authority to okay deals) Where was the money funneled to now???

 

The McCain Institute!!!

 

The Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

The emails released by WikiLeaks and from FOIA requests revealed the pay-to-play schemes and overt conflicts of interest between the Foundation and Clinton’s State Department.

 

Saudi Arabia's contribution to the pay-to-play “Clinton Foundation”, $35 million or more. What did they get in return for their charitable contribution? Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States’ oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

 

Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing — the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 — contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.

 

Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation….

…..AND STILL NO AUDIT…..

 

…according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure — derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) — represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed salesto those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration.

 

These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House.

The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period. And NO AUDIT WAS EVER DONE! It has that pudrid stench of corruption all over it!

 

https://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187