Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:08 a.m. No.27977   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7982

>>27970

>We just have to go through the OIG Monday and take anything we can use.

There will be thousands pouring through those docs and my guess is the research has already been done. More then likely the research Q team made us collect ;)

Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:25 a.m. No.28020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8023 >>8027 >>8033 >>8084

>>27992

Secure voting is unbelievable easy.

  • Voter Id + Receipt from tax return (tax payers vote - degenerates can fuck off)

  • Electronic voting machine prints receipt with random number + who you voted for

  • Machine sends data directly to the net and central location (in real time). Stored in blockchain with software for citizens to download

  • You can then search on the net with your receipt to match code to your vote to verify.

Unbreakable using existing tech.

Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:31 a.m. No.28034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28027

>Disabled military veterans dont pay taxes but arent degenerates.

Obvious exceptions. Have them send in something to the IRS to receive voting slip. Basically verifying you're alive.

Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:39 a.m. No.28052   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28028

>There's more to it than that, my dear. If you are given proof that you voted for a specific person that means people can buy votes.

You mean handing out cash directly to voters?

Unless you can prove it, theres nothing stopping people from selling out.

My post is more about preventing voter fraud, human error in counting and keeping a legit and up to date voter roll.

 

-I could even add: the software itself could be open source so people across the country can work on it for free + we can audit it for errors/exploits.

Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:48 a.m. No.28062   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28055

>and when literally any tom, dick and harry can open their phone and type in their random receipt number and check whether their vote is registered to the candidate they actually voted, that tom, dick or harry, on discovering that their vote has been changed, can throw a fit and demand the govt to check the system.

Exactly where I was going. A few random errors can happen but mass fraud would be way too obvious because you have no idea who will check when they get home and who won't. You also have no idea who the identity of each voter is, only a number associated with the vote.

Anonymous ID: b95808 Jan. 12, 2018, 1:56 a.m. No.28066   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8068 >>8071

>>28060

>prove the paper printed out has the same boxes checked as what you did on the electronic ballot

As example, after it prints the receipt:

Voter: jksfdndju5g9gj5g

Candidate: Trump

At the booth you match the voter code with what it show you on the screen. If satisfied you take the receipt with you home.

From home, you can check again online after the election is counted, to make sure it still matched up.

The second check from home is where you fuck them because even if they changed the vote after you left, they can't possibly know who will check again when they get home. Too many complaints = voter fraud or software error.