Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: ea50a4 No.2014158 📁
Jul 3 2018 13:49:15 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 15bd50 No.2013625 📁
Jul 3 2018 13:00:02 (EST)
anons lawfag here
Re awan
anons already figured this out by i can add that i have suspected for some time that the state charges were just a delay tactic until the main indictments are unsealed
it is also possible or even likely given the way they treated awan that he will be a prosecution witness
since they would have never let him wander otherwise
lots more winning in store
im enjoying the movie!
>>2013625
Matters of National Security.
https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2054-synopsis-classified-information-procedures-act-cipa📁
Q
>Was HRC the only one to use unsecured server(s)?
All were selling us out.
If access was granted re: HRC private server(s) can you assume access was granted re: House server(s) re: AWAN?
>AWAN>Pakistani Intelligence?
>AWAN FREE?
Fuck that little paki bitch and its "brother" like muzzy whores they are.
>Huma>Muslim Brotherhood?
>Matters of NAT SEC.
MB - awan - pak isi - mossad - israel?