>>2779165 pb

>What if access to the server(s) was deliberate?

>What if this is 'known' within the intelligence community?

>What if this is 'known' within the FBI & DOJ?

>If known - why no action?

FBI/Clowns allowed this to happen for their bigger plan of NWO.

>How might this discredit the FBI's investigation into HRC's emails?

Strzok is comped to high heaven. He showed callous bias and disregard for issues of NAT SEC. WHY? If he was a true patriot he would not want a foreign entity having access to secret info.

>How might this OPEN THE DOOR to [WEINER] / [Huma] / [HRC]?

>Logical thinking.

>WHY WAS THE INFORMATION ON WEINER'S LAPTOP IN THE FIRST PLACE?

Insurance policy for Huma in case she was dumped by HRC - AND - she was possibly acting on behalf of a foreign entity (MB or PAK intel). Again, another possible NAT SEC issue.

1. Hussein skipped many Pres Daily Briefs for plaus deniability. Brennan def knew. Rogers (NSA) & Flynn (DIA) threat assessments in PDB ignored by Hussein. Private comms used to hide illegal/treasonous activities. Awan sold Pakistan access to DNC server. Huma sold access to MB.

Bill Maher Skewers Hillary Clinton For Returning To The Spotlight https://trib.al/z0xFji2

How come the Ukraine keeps coming up with regard to the CABAL and plan to overthrow POTUS?

Hillary’s book is cheaper than toilet paper now. Let that sink in.

From a few days ago, but still funny. Trolling Robert Reich.