Anonymous ID: 8ec8e0 Aug. 29, 2018, 6:25 a.m. No.2782236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This was 2016, he messed up and spoke the truth and someone in the press had to correct him

 

Kek

 

An Earnest Mistake? WH Spokesman Blames China for Meddling in US Election - Sputnik International

https://sputniknews.com/world/201612131048490925-earnest-mistake-china-russia-us-election/

Anonymous ID: 8ec8e0 Aug. 29, 2018, 6:35 a.m. No.2782285   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2299 >>2395

>>2782264

They did this with Mueller as well. You know that fucker shot himself in the leg, or had somebody do it for him. This should make any politician that served in the mil during Vietnam suspect and worth scrutiny.

Anonymous ID: 8ec8e0 Aug. 29, 2018, 6:55 a.m. No.2782409   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2782273

How would NSA Intel be able to be admitted as evidence into a hearing regarding PDB? The NSA cannot legally spy directly on the US. The only way is if they gathered the Intel while spying on a foreign agency that was spying on the US and they intercepted.

 

Now the question is who can ask for said NSA intel for use in court as evidence? That would be Congress or another mil court. We all know that DC is slow and not effective at this time so what would be the best option to take this to any court.

 

The DHS can become concerned that the DOJ & FBI are corrupt and ineffective to act because of what has been witnessed recently and ask Secretary of Defense to investigate. Below is how it will work for tribunals that will most likely begin after January 1st 2019.

 

January 1, 2019

"Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law."