once again i support this find
definitely MIRRORING one another. A house of mirrors
w/o details, i'll say that my previous day-to-day life was over as of exactly Oct. 28th.
>they can't get to us and it drives them insane!
i wonder what sicko even had the idea in the first place…then again…
> To the point they have to download and upload gay porn to think their doing their making an effect. Imagine what it feels like to find that doesn't work either, and you've just been viewing gay porn over and over for Nothing!!!
…if they already had it on their computers, they didn't actually had to download it, now did they?? KEK
>AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].
>AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH.
>Internet Bill of Rights.
I think that it's great that anons want to push the #InternetBillOfRights, I have, and will continue to do so. We ran with the presumption that Q asked us to PUSH the IBOR, and there've been anons actually DEMANDING that it be pushed, based off of that initial interpretation (read as PUSH Internet Bill Of Rights, completely bypassing the period at the end of the sentence).
HOWEVER,
re-reading the crumb again and again, I cant help but to have this question. Internet Bill Of Rights is standalone, on its on line, with a period after the word PUSH. So, is this actually a call by to Q to PUSH IBOR as was first guessed, OR, is PUSH referring to the words preceding (AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship'), as in we are being told what the telecommunications companies are being pushed toward, preventing unfair censorship?.
Re_read the crumb. And don't expect Q to confirm or deny as we're supposed to be able to think for our selves.
>Think logically.
We are the calm.
The normies will be outraged.
Both we and the normies will demand justice.
Fake outrage, is not what we're aiming for either.
We will do so practically (rule of law), they may not.
Q's not here to get us to act like rioting like ignorant normies.