I'm not sure why Q is bringing up the Paysuer stuff…makes zero sense. The question of the heart in the jar and the DNA was settled back in 2000.

"PARIS — The question has intrigued historians for 200 years. Was the disease-riddled little boy who died in 1795 after years alone in a prison cell really the son of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette?

Or had royalists managed, at the height of the French Revolution, to spirit the young heir from harm after his parents were sent to the guillotine?

Wednesday, two scientists said they could offer proof that the 10-year-old was indeed Louis XVII. He had endured two years in Temple prison, where he was left unattended and in the dark for long stretches, with skin tumors, scabies and increasing signs of madness.

After examining all that remains of the boy–a dried heart–the scientists said they had been able to match the boy's DNA with that of other members of the royal family, including DNA taken from a lock of Marie Antoinette's hair.

"This is the end of 200 years of uncertainty," said Philippe Delorme, a historian who had pressed for the test and helped announced the results. "It is a very exciting day for historians. It puts to an end a mystery that has absorbed so many of us. Now we have an answer."

Through the years, more than 500 books have been written about the young dauphin, and many theories emerged about his possible escape and presumed exile."

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-04-20/news/0004200152_1_dna-dead-boy-samples

It's always been a "conspiracy" with many men claiming to be the dauphin…but just like the Anastasia asshatery, Daniel Paysuer was NOT the daulphin of France.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-04-20/news/0004200152_1_dna-dead-boy-samples

HOWEVER that didn't stop the stupid conspiracies. Which were likely sourced from this stupid document

https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95AEDE7B8A49624_Springmeier.-.Bloodlines.of.the.Illuminati.R.pdf

Which includes a "conspiracy" about AA Springs being the father of Abraham Lincoln. The conspiracy of HIS birth is really quite simple. Nancy Hanks was melungeon, a fact clearly seen in Abraham Lincoln's face.

SO Q, why bring this shit up, DNA evidence by people with absolutely nothing to prove one way or the other with living DNA donors….Daniel Paysuer was NOT the dauphin of France, and George Bashore/Paysure was NOT French, he was born in PA, and his father was born in Germany.

https://www.geni.com/people/George-Pasour-II/6000000027821135734

What the actual fuck derail is this? Whether or not the Paysuers are or were wealthy is beside the point…the arrow YOU were aiming was at an easily disproven conspiracy of Daniel's identity as the dauphin of France. Idiots.

>>2785013

>>2785013

>of course no one would ever lie about that now

SERIOUSLY?

You're kidding, right? Because family DNA studies are all the rage and hiding something like that NOW is next to impossible. There was no motivation to lie about the dauphin, just like the princes in the tower and Richard III.

I'd say DNA matches to LIVING people out ranks any idiotic conspiracy PDF…which the fool who did his genealogy chart actually linked to…which is disproven by his own research on Bayshore's place of birth.

What you want to believe and what is proven true scientifically is a great distance apart.

This information was easily found. So why is Q diverting to this asshattery? There was a Canadian man actually BURIED as the dauphin, such were the tales of the imposters.

The lie is in the PDF, granting a false power and false identity to someone in order to elevate them to a position they could not have held. PAYSUER family DNA projects do not match the French royal family. End of story.