>yet not one history book available from the entire decade of the 60's
Interdasting…I've never looked for history written in the 60's…focus on 1950s and prior cuz the taint started creeping in during the 60s.
>yet not one history book available from the entire decade of the 60's
Interdasting…I've never looked for history written in the 60's…focus on 1950s and prior cuz the taint started creeping in during the 60s.
>My guess is it's Google. They need to pick a side in this war.
I think they picked their side long ago, anon.
And what's online can be edited/changed/scrubbed. That's why printed books are the best, safest.
Yes they do. Depositions.
https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/criminal/criminal-law-basics/criminal-depositions-preserving-witness-testimony.html
https://twitter.com/SecretService/status/1032333772920971264
Secret Service seeking assistance to identify this unknown individual believed to have made threatening statements in Washington D.C. on August 12, 2018. For more information or to make a report: https://www.secretservice.gov/data/press/releases/2018/18-AUG/Seeking_Information_2.pdf
>Orh wasn't fired because public officials cant plea the 5th
INTERROGATING GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
https://www.fletc.gov/audio/interrogating-government-employees-mp3
FTA:
self-incrimination issues that arise in the context of interrogating or interviewing government employees during the course of misconduct investigations
As public employees, the Standards of Conduct that guide their employment generally require they cooperate with internal investigations into their employment-related conduct. On the one hand, they have a right under the Fifth Amendment to refuse to answer an investigator’s questions when they believe their responses could be used to criminally prosecute them.