Wealthy cabals run America

Oligarchs aren’t even trying to hide their influence any more

On December 28, the New York Times ran an article about a small group of powerful people in Minnesota.

The members of the Itasca Project, who aren’t elected, are, in the words of Times journalist Nelson D. Schwartz, “a private civic initiative by 60 or so local leaders to further growth and development in the Twin Cities.” But rather than exposing the group as a secret cabal running things in a large American city, the article reads more like an advertisement. Schwartz calls the 13 men and women of the Itasca Project’s Working Team “The Establishment 2.0,” and he doesn’t seem to mean it in a bad way.

From their borrowed perch on the 38th floor of an unnamed but identifiable Minneapolis skyscraper, the Itasca Project’s goal is to shape regional economic policy through direct collective influence on lawmakers.

The group has successfully pushed through a gas tax increase to fund transportation infrastructure, state support for local businesses, as well as a government agency to attract new companies.

Soon, they want to get involved in education reform, shoving McKinsey consultants and their rubrics on public schools. Schwartz credits the Itasca Project with a peculiar kind of friendly Midwestern ethic, but their behavior isn’t so strange. It’s just what capitalists do.

When we Americans talk about capitalism, it’s usually as an economic system that complements the political system of democracy. Competing capitalists keep the state from accumulating too much power, and the elected government puts a regulatory check on business interests.

At least that’s how it’s supposed to work. In practice, it goes a little differently. Think of the presidential election: Not one person has cast even a primary ballot, but the wealthy have already spent untold millions preparing our choices.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was forced to drop out of the campaign in September for lack of funds. His particular demise is no loss for the country, but if even a union-busting midwestern Republican can’t afford to compete, then how much of a choice do we really have?

The Itasca Project is just one example of existing oligarchy, and a surprisingly open one at that. But even if they don’t announce themselves on the cover of the Times business section, groups of millionaires exercise undue influence on every aspect of American life every day.

There are millionaires who back each national Party and some who back both. Their foundations conduct diplomacy with foreign heads of state and their Chambers of Commerce accompany the American government wherever it operates.

There are groups of millionaires who determine education policy, communications policy, agriculture policy, monetary policy, and whatever other policy you can think of. There’s even “The Patriotic Millionaires,” a group of — yes, millionaires — devoted to reducing the political influence of … millionaires. A member of their advisory board, the aptly-named textile tycoon James Richman, has given thousands of dollars to both the Clinton and Bush 2016 presidential campaigns.

As Donald Trump has announced again and again during his presidential campaign, money and power don’t have a party affiliation.

Democracy isn’t supposed to be a vehicle for wealthy people to hedge their bets, but the open secret is that capitalism is more than just an economic regime. It’s a total social system, and it’s ruled by a small class of people, not elected representatives as such. The practices that we think of as making up democracy — like voting, volunteerings, protesting, writing op-eds — are just part of what determines the structure of American social reality, and not a very big part when it comes down to it. Between “money is power” and “all power to the people,” we know which one describes life in the United States.

China - Cabal player

Think logically … when was the start of when China became an economic power ?

In late 70s and early 80s was the start . By 90s , it was already overtaking much of the global markets . By 2000s , it has overtaken almost everything .

Today , we have massive amounts of goods that are of low quality and cheap . Almost all made in China .

Cabal gave the global economy to China on silver platter , turning whole China into a gigantic sweatshop that is always hungry for more resources .

These resources are limited - and when resources are limited , the wars happen . Once all of the resources are exploited , the total collapse begins … and then the Cabal would ride in like a "saviour" and push onto everyone transhumanist plan .

China is and was one of the main Cabal players - even more than former USA government , as it was a crucial cog in their plan of total control .

By allowing hyperproduction , they would align the timeline with total exploitation of resources and humans . By allowing hyperproduction , the global standard of various goods went down rapidly . Something that lasted for decades , suddenly had its "factory default life" , all in the name of profit making .

To take out the Chinese hyperproduction would mean less pollution , less material and resources used and essentially wasted , less need to recycle , and muhc lower exploitation of Chinese people as workforce ( whose mentality is actually far more money-oriented than of people in West ) .

The whole hyperproduction served also one important thing - to achieve global market levels that are unrealistic and heavily inflated , pretty much artificial bubble on its own . The fake presentation of "growth" , while it is actually not growth , but exactly the opposite under the mask .

It is highly important we reach the full disclosure of advanced technologies - but even before that , to achieve global financial reset .

I think that Trump and his cabinet are actually using the old system against the Cabal . At one point , the old system will need to be unplugged , permanently , like a sick person with terminal illness on their bed …