I'm going to post this again to spark discussion on why Q introduced the Daniel Paysuer "conspiracy". That he was supposedly the dauphin of France is easily disproven by family DNA studies, unless one wishes to claim hundreds of Bourbon heirs are ALL lying and ALL have fake family tress, fake DNA, fake tests…all to hide this?
What IS likely true is that his father, George CHANGED HIS NAME to hide his German JEWISH heritage.
I'm not sure why Q is bringing up the Paysuer stuff…makes zero sense. The question of the heart in the jar and the DNA was settled back in 2000.
"PARIS — The question has intrigued historians for 200 years. Was the disease-riddled little boy who died in 1795 after years alone in a prison cell really the son of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette?
Or had royalists managed, at the height of the French Revolution, to spirit the young heir from harm after his parents were sent to the guillotine?
Wednesday, two scientists said they could offer proof that the 10-year-old was indeed Louis XVII. He had endured two years in Temple prison, where he was left unattended and in the dark for long stretches, with skin tumors, scabies and increasing signs of madness.
After examining all that remains of the boy–a dried heart–the scientists said they had been able to match the boy's DNA with that of other members of the royal family, including DNA taken from a lock of Marie Antoinette's hair.
"This is the end of 200 years of uncertainty," said Philippe Delorme, a historian who had pressed for the test and helped announced the results. "It is a very exciting day for historians. It puts to an end a mystery that has absorbed so many of us. Now we have an answer."
Through the years, more than 500 books have been written about the young dauphin, and many theories emerged about his possible escape and presumed exile."
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-04-20/news/0004200152_1_dna-dead-boy-samples
It's always been a "conspiracy" with many men claiming to be the dauphin…but just like the Anastasia asshatery, Daniel Paysuer was NOT the dauphin of France.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-04-20/news/0004200152_1_dna-dead-boy-samples
HOWEVER that didn't stop the stupid conspiracies. Which were likely sourced from this stupid document
https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95AEDE7B8A49624_Springmeier.-.Bloodlines.of.the.Illuminati.R.pdf
Which includes a "conspiracy" about AA Springs being the father of Abraham Lincoln. The conspiracy of HIS birth is really quite simple. Nancy Hanks was melungeon, a fact clearly seen in Abraham Lincoln's face. WHICH has been proven by DNA testing of Hanks matrilineal descendants…his mother was X1c..so it is correct that Abe Lincoln was NOT white, and in fact was Melungeon. AND his father was indeed THOMAS LINCOLN
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?2894-Abraham-Lincoln-U152-L2
SO why all the bullshit eh?
https://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_X_mtDNA.shtml
SO Q, why bring this shit up, DNA evidence by people with absolutely nothing to prove one way or the other with living DNA donors….Daniel Paysuer was NOT the dauphin of France, and George Bashore/Paysure was NOT French, he was born in PA, and his father was born in Germany.
https://www.geni.com/people/George-Pasour-II/6000000027821135734
What the actual fuck derail is this? Whether or not the Paysuers are or were wealthy is beside the point…the arrow YOU were aiming was at an easily disproven conspiracy of Daniel's identity as the dauphin of France. Idiots. AND why the actual fuck did absolutely no one question this?
Anymore proof needed that this site is invaded by sheep?