Q MY ARGUMENT STANDS AS THIS:
If Trump gains enormous power from the destruction of the cabal, what guarantee do we have that hew ill truly hand it back to the people?
Gestalt Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGgaXXBkE8A
Q MY ARGUMENT STANDS AS THIS:
If Trump gains enormous power from the destruction of the cabal, what guarantee do we have that hew ill truly hand it back to the people?
Gestalt Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGgaXXBkE8A
Let's use logic, he will have enough power to sway a congress enthralled to him to override vast majorities of the Congress?
Assume he wins more than a supermajority, that puts him in range of a 2/3's. We need to be vigilant and get guarantees that this won't lead to tyranny patriots.
THINK FOR OURSELVES
Ask yourself, why is Washington considered the greatest President?
I would argue it's because he established the two term rule and shunned absolute power. With a massive Congressional majority we need to make sure our revolution stays intact without empowering another Cabal.
That is why I posted the link. We need to stay independent as researchers, patriots and thinkers and make sure we don't trade one for another.
These are the exact debates our founding fathers had in the state houses, except they had only one BREAD to solve the issue!
I also want to add that I don't think Q is advocating tyranny. He's telling the truth.
Do we want to make sure our solution to this issue does not involve clothing POTUS in absolute power.
Is that unreasonable?
I have to correct you anon. The constitution works fine as long as it is in the HANDS OF THE PEOPLE, not "the moral people".
The fake news claims this, so do the PAYTRIOTS. We need to make sure this system can withstand the infinite lust of mankind and deliver prosperity for all.
As an autist I'm remiss in being afraid of massive power being directed in the hands of POTUS.
Even if he is a good man, he's a man. He's human, he's fallible, just like you and me.
We need a guarantee that he will create a self-destruct mechanism to ensure two things:
1) The Cabal has a far harder hill to climb if they ever want to try this shit again (think post-Civil War).
2) Patriots that gain power are still bound by our laws in a form much smaller than what we currently have. That includes 3-Letter Agencies being abolished, concentrated private capital being constrained, and citizens having maximum power.
I completely agree that right now, we did this and are fulfilling this.
But we need a better way to make sure it never again gets to this point.
Cleaning the rot does not stop the rot from growing again. Saying things like, "we'll be vigilant" can easily die in a generation.
We need a tried and true mechanism that POTUS can create. That means he needs to enforce the constitution and completely restructure our government as it stands.
Sorry I have to add on the last point.
Go further anon, think about all the corruption Q is pointing out as it relates to National Police and Espionage capabilities.
Are these capabilities that our Founding Fathers envisioned? The fact that they exist mean that they can be corrupted like ANY POWERFUL SYSTEM.
Should we allow such a thing to exist?
Doesn't it dawn on us a Patriots to demand POTUS dissolve these organizations?
That's correct. But he could've been King.
He rejected that power. Lincoln echoed this as well. We need to make sure POTUS shrinks the power of DC for this to be a SUSTAINABLE REVOLUTION.
Q I'm sorry it may be the Ron Paul Revolution in me but….
We need assurances that POTUS will shrink the size of centralized power to keep our revolution SUSTAINABLE.
Not concerning for non-reasons.
I'm using LOGIC.
Watching the budget, increases for the security state. Am I wrong?
Have you seen anything from the administration denoting a dismantling of a current government department?
If you can answer yes, please provide the arguments instead of copypasta'ing a picture of a needle. Don't be a fucking faggot anon.
Concerned Patriot, I have a mom, dad, and kids and I'm concerned as hell. Fight me.
14th post and I apologize anons. Been drinking and I can't help but remember the arguments (documented) our founding fathers had in the history books.
We'd be remembered as severe faggots if we didn't have the same arguments toward the same divine truth.
That makes sense. I can see that the debates originally reached balance on that point.
"All systems require maintenance in order for them to function."
Amen anon. Thank you.
Look, not a shill, not a fag, I think this put me at ease and I'll stop.
Thanks anon. God bless you patriots.
Again, anon this is the most concise and clear explanation of what has happened.
I'm going to have to explain this shit to my mom, dad, wife and kids when The Storm hits and I think, in a historical sense you completely nailed it.
Thank you, screencapping that should go in a digital museum on day.