>>2789614 (lb)
re: notable:
lol, right. The problem is in the graph itself: September needs to be taken off, and it should be a line chart connecting data points rather than a trendline.
But it is interesting how there is a constant rate of growth (about 5k/month added). That indicates a team of fixed size, with more to work with than they can handle. Why do I say that? Because if it were hard to find the next indictment, you would see the rate slow because the low-hanging fruit would have already been picked. But as it stands they have a constant rate of output, meaning that the only thing slowing them down is the rate at which they can process and file the indictment. So essentially they're like asshole counters that stumble into a huge ANTIFA protest.
If the trend continues, we might see 50k at the end of this month, and 55k at the end of next month.