Anonymous ID: 3f30c0 Aug. 29, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.2792708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2813

so COOL story

mostly ive been the digger of old CBTS stuff rather than new breads and new decodes

and recently mostly ive been stuck (entertained) on nov 5th thru dec 1st

from Hussein jury duty and flyeaglesfly(lynn de roth) to Q's assistance post copter/cessna collison to decode the incident

one of the main decodes is the keyword GREEN

unfortunately thats about it for now (because why continue with speculation) [leave it with the Q facts]

 

i will say one speculation DELTA FORCE is GREEN

Anonymous ID: 3f30c0 Aug. 29, 2018, 8:29 p.m. No.2792892   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2792651

i got one that goes with

>>2792153 References to Q and history books being changed

i posted a part of it earlier but Q just posted so i held off

 

publication date is 1992

 

excepts:

In the 1986 National Assessment of History and Literature, most 17-year-old students said they had studied World War II, yet only 53 percent of them knew that Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union when the United States entered the war

 

Paul Gagnon, in both his U.S. history and world history textbooks studies (1987 and 1989), has documented the inadequacies of the textbook treatments of World War II. He discusses four themes the textbooks either neglect or present poorly, which should be emphasized: (1) students should be helped to imagine the probable consequences of a Nazi victory; (2) students need to know the actual consequences of fighting war on such a scale and of achieving total victory over the Axis powers; (3) textbooks need to clarify the complex causes of the Second World War; and (4) texts should examine the policy of appeasement because it provides insight into the difficulties of making foreign policy in democratic societies (Gagnon 1989, 124-25).

 

One major textbook, for example, wrongly dated the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Another book misdated such events as Germany's remilitarization of the Rhineland. In a third widely used textbook, students were asked why Churchill "delay[ed] sending troops to Stalingrad?" In reality, Churchill did not send troops to Stalingrad at all, nor did he ever contemplate it.

 

source

www.ericdigests.org/1992-2/war.htm