>>2796145 whoozat?

>>2796162

Was it the Payseur dig?

Last evening's bread wasn't exactly comfy either.

>>2796311

Last night someone posted this.

I asked which Order they referred to and they told me to "move along", i.e. they wanted Anons to figger it out.

Jesuits? Recent new Black Pope installed?

Seems to refer to Sovereign Military Order of Malta.

Anybody got further sauce about this?

I dislike that poster's give-away formatting and superior attitude, but maybe they know something?

>>2796358

^^^ looks that way

>>2796387

>>2796368

I thought POTUS sort of endorsed Rick Scott on Aug 28 (pic)? Well, he doesn't use his strongest phrase "complete and total endorsement". It's a bit watered down. POTUS wants this man in the Senate or not?

>>2796409

>>2796348

This is incomprehensible.

>>2796423

I posted a few thoughts about this yesterday. Reiterating (for your consideration).

Comments?

>>2796447

>>2796519

Not exact duplicate. POTUS changed the spelling from Councel (wrong spelling) to Counsel, as he has done so many times before, on purpose.

S→C

drawing attention to

S.C. → special counsel?

or drawing attention to the letter cap C → Clinton?

What do you think?

>>2796454

Couple theories floating around.

1) >>2796457

2) >>2796555

There may be others

BAKER NOTABLE

>>2796523 IG paper trail proves HRC was put on notice March 2011 of personal email risks and automatic email forwarding to 3rd parties

>>2796566

>>2796592

>claiming to be from the State Dept.

It looks to be a document written by a private individual claiming to act on behalf of (some unspecified shadow government entity based on some unclear legal theory)

I found it incomprehensible.

>>2796650

Good catch. I missed that.