>>2801351 (pb)

it is interesting information that at least two bakers have failed to heed popular consensus and failed to include it in notables

at this point it has had enough exposure that those of us with eyes have seen it and I will not bring it up again as it has almost become a slide.

If you are interested you've seen the links… dig it

real eyes

realize

real lies

wwg1wga

>>2801667

I was mildly surprised at the resurgence of the IWW

they've been re-incarnated

>>2801750

I don't know anon if it must be, then let it be

McStain Senate Office Building

>>2801680

you are asking for

Donations aren't you???

to cover legal expenses