Can anybody here be on the right track without knowing about the falsifiication of the chronology of history?
They are liar and jokers and pride themselves on such.
In any case they falsified the genealogy of L.C. Payseur, at least in part.
I believe they are lying about being in the bloodline of the Holy King; that not direct descendants, but the murderers - perhaps cousins, but even that is perhaps doubtful?
They falsified it.
You can clearly see they falsify their inheritance
They did some cut and paste @ the geni
Arthur Hath away 3 b. 1655
is alleged the father of
Hannah Ha thaway [MFS ?] b. 1515 - 1575
After this break in the lineage everybody [all the "extra" people, quite a number of probably real ancestors? are from ~Germany/ Baden Hesse with one exception;
Until North Carolina.]
I'm assuming they did the same trick as "Bush" from Scherff?
They 've done some cut and paste on it, so there are too many generations crowding in the line, considering the time which has elapsed. Not only that t's obviously forged in part.
I know this throws a wrench into everybodies theories.
They probably want people to believe they are "Merovingian" [likely a mythological King FWIW]
But consider this: Who killed the Holy King?
Were they of the same family?
Did this murder create wars?
Did the killers of this Holy King create the religions who base their cult upon his killing?
If they are ancient "Satanists" would be the ones to create the religions for those whom they consider their livestock, to follow?
Is Fomenko and his researchers correct, that all this history didn't happen 2000 + years ago, but is much closer to us in time?
Did they falsify the "Middle Ages?" and the "Ancient World?"
I guess so. But sloppy as usual.
Never planned for the Internets?