>>281012

I must point out a thought…

Is the candy crush screen (which looks blurrier than others) a shopped image to conceal the actual screen display?

(that would be visible in the RAW image?)

>>281091

Retracted theory:

There is a second image (blurrier) of the candy crush screen.

Making it even more unlikely that a shop job would be on both images…

ANONS:

Is anyone curious what the blurred line reveals?

To find out, match THAT image on GETTY.

IF the "RAW" is available for it, then we can pursue purchasing.

They blurred it for a reason…

>>281217

Is that the image where the phones are readable?

Is it available in RAW format?

This would contain the blurred line of text…

ANONS!!!!

The center phone, readable image:

It is the ending of the speech at the website linked.

NOTE THE BLURRED LINE IS AFTER

(This is where I HOPE SOMEONE SHOOTS TRUMP must have been)

WE NEED THAT EXACT image in RAW FORMAT to see original text…

(Gettyfags search for it?!)

There is likely no "other" image.

http:// www.dispatch.com/news/20180131/state-of-union-what-ohio-politicians-had-to-say-about-trumps-speech

>>281518

IF that image is available in RAW, that is unedited, it could not be blurred.

Thumbnail may be. But image cannot be if RAW.