Thanks for playing fucktard. Keep using the same shill syntax and muhjoo crap. You get triggered every fucking time and it is so easy to make you glow.
>shareblue doesnt have access to spy sattelites.
Of course they dont, and i bet you know it first hand. But the atmosphere you fuckers had yesterday night was probably grim. Brock asking for more ball massages, hard times. Fuck off
"Fishing is fun"
I see projection is the new thing down in Brocks anus.
Low iq never wins fucktard, learn this.
Is it a jewish thing to cover your skin in gold? Worship owls and the eye of ra? spirit cooking? pyramids? Y heads?
Don't you realize that jews are a cover for the real Ruling Families?
again. Is it a jewish thing to cover your skin in gold? Worship owls and the eye of ra? spirit cooking? pyramids? Y heads?
muhjoos is a cover tactic for the real RULING FAMILIES.
Most of those jews who are soros usefull idiots are actually leftist self haters. On the other hand you have the Israeli based majority and the US orthodox jews who overwhelmingly support trump.
>An opinion poll published Sunday shows deep divisions between Israeli and American Jews, particularly in relation to US President Donald Trump, highlighting the growing rift between the world’s two largest Jewish communities.
>The survey by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) showed 77 percent of Israeli Jews approved of the president’s handling of US-Israel relations, while only 34 percent of American Jews did. Fifty-seven percent of US Jews disapproved, while only 10 percent of Israeli Jews did.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-shows-deep-divisions-between-israeli-and-us-jews-on-trump-peace/
on the other hand you got this:
Israelis overwhelmingly favor US President Donald Trump over his predecessor Barack Obama, according to a poll released on Wednesday, and are lukewarm in their support for the immigration of American Jews to the Jewish state.
On the other hand you have this:
>The survey, conducted for Haaretz newspaper to coincide with US Independence Day, found that almost half of Israelis — 49 percent — strongly approved of Trump (and 23% slightly approved), while only 22% disapproved of the US president.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israelis-overwhelmingly-prefer-trump-to-obama-poll/
And since it is Haaretz poll, which is a soros mouthpiece, then in reality much more support trump then even stated.
Also you have the US orthodox jews:
MainAll NewsJewish WorldPoll: Overwhelming amount of Orthodox Jews support Trump
Poll: Overwhelming amount of Orthodox Jews support Trump
A poll by US-based haredi magazine finds more than 90% of observant Jews support current president.
Tzvi Lev, 06/08/18 03:14
Share
Donald Trump
Donald TrumpReuters
>A new survey found that an overwhelming percentage of Orthodox Jews support President Donald Trump.
>According to the poll, which was commissioned by the US-based haredi Ami Magazine, 91% of American Orthodox Jews gave Trump a "Satisfactory" or "Very Satisfactory" rating. Only 8.4% said that they were unhappy with the president's performance.
>The poll suggests a deep divide between Orthodox Jews and their non-observant counterparts. In twin polls of Israeli and American Jews published in June by the American Jewish Committee, 57 percent of American Jews disapproved of Trump's performance while only 34 percent approved.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/250068
The Ruling Families are every sheeps' problem. The problem is most jews like all other people are clueless normies.
I say that you fail to see the difference between the occult ruling families, their servants, and regular jews. And I also say that you do it on purpose to hide them.
try harder clown.
http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
>The Talmud Does Not Permit Sex With A Three Year Old
>The accusation here is quite nefarious. It implies that Judaism permits pedophilia, has no respect for women, and generally advocates loose sexual morals. To those familiar with the Talmud, this claim is patently ridiculous. However, the majority of people — particularly those making this claim — know little to nothing about the Talmud, its contents, or its methodology. On our website The Real Truth About The Talmud, we elaborate on these issues. However, for now, we will focus on the accusation at hand. It is, in fact, easily verified as being incorrect.
>Talmud Ketuvot 11b (The citation mentioned is evidently in error. Talmud Yevamot 11b has no relevant passage)
>Rav Yehudah said in the name of Rav: A male child who has relations with a female adult causes her to be like one who was injured with a stick… Rava said: This is what was meant - an adult male who has relations with a female child has not done anything because less than this [three years old] is like sticking a finger into an eyeball.
>While those unused to these Talmudic discussions might be taken aback by the use of euphemisms, the discussion here relates to the dowry for virgins and non-virgins. It has nothing to do with what acts are allowed, encouraged, forbidden, or discouraged. It is, indeed, ironic that this passage has been manipulated from its original context of a financial discussion into one of a religious discussion. While there are numerous talmudic passages of a religious nature, this one discusses dowries and not forbidden and permitted relations!
>The Talmud relates that a virgin is entitled a higher dowry. While the tell-tale sign of virginity is the release of blood due to the breaking of the hymen on the wedding night, there are occasions when the hymen has already been broken such as when the woman suffered an injury. The Talmud here quotes Rav Yehuda in the name of Rav that a sexual act with a male minor is not considered to be a loss of virginity because one of the participants is not fully active. While the female's hymen may have been broken, she has not engaged in what can be classified as a sexual act (although it is certainly child abuse).
>The Talmud continues and quotes Rava as saying that a sexual act between a male adult and a female under the age of three is also not considered a loss of virginity (although it is child abuse). Since the girl is too young for her hymen to be broken, she is still considered a virgin.
>Nowhere is the Talmud permitting such behavior. Sex outside of a marriage is strictly forbidden (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Ishut 1:4, Hilchot Na'arah Betulah 2:17; Shulchan Aruch, Even HaEzer 26:1, 177:5) as is this obvious case of child abuse. The Talmud is only discussing ex post facto what would happen if such a case arose.
>That non-marital sexual relations is prohibited is stated explicitly by Maimonides in the following passage from his ground-breaking legal code Mishneh Torah:
>Whoever has licentious relations with a woman without marriage bonds is lashed by biblical mandate.
>The claim that the Talmud, or normative Judaism, permits sexual relations with a minor is almost entirely incorrect. The slight truth in it is that, in certain societies in history, people were sometimes married as young as ten. While this was most recently done in Czarist Russia in order to avoid being drafted into the Czar's army (which was made especially difficult for Jews), it is not currently done. However, even in that case, marriage is required before having sexual relations. Judaism as a religion prohibits sexual relations, indeed even minor touching such as holding hands, outside of marriage.
>It is certainly true that there are individual Jews who do not follow the teaching of the Talmud. That is their personal choice, just like many Catholics choose to use birth control and have premarital relations despite their religion's teaching against it. This does not mean that Catholicism permits premarital relations and it does not mean that Judaism (and the Talmud) does either. The personal choices of people whether to follow completely their religion does not reflect on what their religion teaches. Similarly, the fact that certain Muslims drink alcohol and frequent prostitutes does not mean that their religion permits it. It means that these individuals choose to defy their religion.
>We leave it to others to deduce why some people would make baseless accusations against the Talmud and, by implication, Judaism and Jews.