People are saying it is a different image, maybe it is and it is the one we need, why not try to get it. If we have that rich fag willing to buy it, then we should try it.

>>281681 The point went over your head, THIS BLURRY PIC IS NOT MISSING THE TEXT.

>>281709 Looks like the same text from a minorly different angle to me.

>>281750

>>281763

Q needs to quote the closest anon, or give us another clue, without cash or WAY BETTER PHOTO\VID fags this seems like a rat race we are losing, I am not giving up I will forever dig, but this one is bugging the shit out of me.

>>281909 I would take a hint of its a still or a vid ONE OR THE OTHER, and if its the still, BUY it or DONT. I guess we cannot be spoon fed everything.

>>281947

>>281915

>>281862

Interesting angle, And q did say civilian tech wont work almost let us know that the wrong angle, butttt are journalists considered civilian, a senators phone might be non civilian hint, but would that not mean those guys are DEMS.