Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 7:59 p.m. No.281841   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1860 >>1877 >>1901 >>1913 >>1936 >>1943 >>2323

RICHFAGS PLEASE

 

Someone needs to contact the author and make an offer to BUY the raw footage video. That's what Q is pointing us to.

 

The picture is expensive so the whole video roll is going to be expensive as fuck - but Q is pretty damn clear - I bet the whole video is going to have a fuck ton of phones with a fuck ton of messages from a fuck ton of people.

 

RICH FAGS WE NEED YOU

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:06 p.m. No.281943   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>281841

> https:// twitter.com/somogettynews?lang=en

> https:// www.gettyimages.com/search/photographer?family=editorial&photographer=chip%20somodevilla&sort=best#license

> http:// infocus.gettyimages.com/post/chip-somodevilla-mygettyoffice

> https:// www.instagram.com/somophoto/?hl=en

> http:// www.northernshortcourse.org/speakers/chip-somodevilla/

 

Cannot find an email contact for the photographer anywhere - twitter or IG might be viable.

 

Yes the CIA might trace the purchase back and kill you, that's where we are at I suppose.

 

I'm not sure if we'll be able to find another source if they take it down first (they may already have, hard to imagine they aren't all over this place).

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.282033   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Is there some FOIA request that can be made for the RAW footage? Are there some legal requirements for accessibility of the footage? It seems like most POTUS footage has some special rules of accessibility - not sure if a private photographer would actually be able to withhold it legally?

 

Maybe we could get Judicial Watch to try and get a hold of it.

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:19 p.m. No.282110   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>> You are now working against those monitoring.

 

This means if we don't get it in time, (they) will make sure it's gone forever.

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:30 p.m. No.282248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282190

I'm guessing if Q went to such lengths to point it out then he knows it will be useful (I'd presume they know every message sent from every phone in that speech duration).

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:32 p.m. No.282262   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282249

I don't know professional photographers workflow super well, but i deal with some fairly large data – I'm gonna guess they have local storage + periodic backups to some storage service that deals with large backups.

 

If they /only/ had the RAW locally then glowfags can go take it out quickly - the race is that they need to make sure all the backups are taken down and that's going to be at 1+ off-site service cloud storage.

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:34 p.m. No.282280   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282232

because it means there's more phones with more info in other parts of the video and the RAW is high enough resolution to read the text (if not in all of it at least during some zooms)

Anonymous ID: 9f98b6 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:38 p.m. No.282328   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2345

>>282303

honestly i dont have a real answer, i would presume the military intel would be pulling all the phone communications from everyone for the whole investigation overall; Q says 'we see you' enough that i figure they have /some/ way of seeing everything