>>281556

Yea.. I have a feeling this one is something as well, but then why would the other one be edited? Regardless, we are not gonna be able to see info from any of the images we currently have. We don not have the tech. That's why Q said ">>281556

>Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.

>>281794

Right. WE NEED THE RAW FILE. Why doesn't someone just try and contact him on twatter or instaho? We need someone with some "clout" though to do it, bigger name with a lot of followers and such.

>>281884

lol.. He's just a photographer right?

>>281971

Exactly this.