Anonymous ID: ae96af Aug. 31, 2018, 9:10 a.m. No.2816998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7090

Leader of self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic killed in E. Ukraine blast

 

An explosion that rocked a cafe in central Donetsk city in eastern Ukraine killed the leader Aleksandr Zakharchenko, the leader of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, and injured several other top officials.

 

Media reports said that Zakharchenko was severely injured as a blast hit a restaurant called ‘Separ’ in Donetsk city center. He died later in a local hospital.

 

“The head of the DNR, Alenksandr Zakharchenko, has died as a result of a terrorist act,” a spokesperson of the self-proclaimed republic’s administration told journalists, revealing no details of the incident.

 

DETAILS TO FOLLOW

https://www.rt.com/news/437357-head-donbass-republic-killed/

Anonymous ID: ae96af Aug. 31, 2018, 9:13 a.m. No.2817037   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Louisiana State Police are being sued by a Harvard lecturer over their alleged refusal to release a list of anti-Trump petitioners that they had. He says it originated from a neo-Nazi website, and was named “Antifa list.”

 

Harvard Law School lecturer Thomas Frampton is suing Louisiana State Police (LSP) over its alleged failure to release a list of thousands of citizens who had signed a petition against US President Donald Trump. According to the lawsuit, the list comes from a hoax roster that originally showed up a year ago on neo-Nazi conspiracy theories website, 8Chan, WGNO reports.

 

READ MORE: WaPo column praises McCain as human rights champion with photo of him next to 'literal neo-Nazi'

 

The list was discovered by New Orleans civil-rights attorney William Most. Frampton is now taking action against the LSP’s Baton Rouge police department on his behalf.

 

The LSP’s alleged implication with neo-Nazi groups drew the ire of the public, some of whom went as far as to accuse the “racist” police force of taking orders from white supremacist group, the Ku Klux Klan.

 

Attorneys are suing #Louisiana police who refuse to turn over emails relating to "antifa member list" found on 8chan and neo-Nazi websites. The list rooster itself is laughable, but what exactly do police not want the public to see? https://t.co/HxovqbYhAd

— It's Going Down (@IGD_News) 30 августа 2018 г.

 

News of the lawsuit prompted others to call for the State Police to be “abolished” altogether.

 

This is very alarming. Louisiana State Police are now getting their marching orders from the #AltRight and the #KKK?!?!

Lawsuit claims Louisiana State Police has ‘antifa’ roster from Neo-Nazi site https://t.co/JFgCZAJKTu

— #TheResistance (@BoneKnightmare) August 31, 2018

 

Others suggested there may be some more suspicious reasons for the police not wanting the documents in the public domain.

 

One of the wilder allegations I've seen in a while — that Louisiana State Police got a phony "list of antifa" document from Stormfront and 8chan.https://t.co/xMxxPsTLhn

— no, or (@nooralsibai) 31 августа 2018 г.

 

The whole case unraveled when Most demanded in May that LSP release thousands of internal emails containing hateful and racist communication, including phrases such as “white genocide.”

 

LSP initially delayed the release but after a few months relented and handed out 64 emails.

 

It was then that Most spotted a document called “full list of antifa.docx,” which had reportedly been circulated among the department’s most senior officials, as well as local enforcement ones.

 

The attorney requested the department give him the list in question, but LSP refused on the grounds that it would “compromise” an ongoing investigation which was expected to result in arrests. The police also hesitated for fear the document would blow the cover of their “confidential informant,” Most claimed.

https://www.rt.com/usa/437361-louisiana-police-antifa-neo-nazi/

Anonymous ID: ae96af Aug. 31, 2018, 9:37 a.m. No.2817390   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This guy basically twisted himself in knots trying to justify the "witch hunt" but in the end even he couldn't rationalize it's purpose and usefulness

 

'Where is the collusion?' Answers to all your questions about the Russia investigation

By Chris Megerian

Aug 31, 2018 | 3:00 AM

| Washington

 

 

The news flooding out of the Russia investigation can feel relentless, a nonstop torrent of indictments, plea deals and legal maneuvering. President Trump regularly blasts the probe as a “witch hunt” and denies any wrongdoing. “Where is the collusion?” he demanded in a recent rally.

 

The November midterm elections are looming, so it’s a good time to take stock of what special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has done so far and what could happen next.

Let’s get right to the point. Has anyone found any collusion?

 

The short answer is that no U.S. citizens have been charged with working with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election.

So what are all these criminal charges about?

 

You can separate the charges into two categories. The first includes the indictments of 25 Russians for allegedly interfering in the election, either through spreading misinformation on social media or hacking email accounts of Democrats and releasing them online. Charges include conspiracy, identity theft and money laundering, and some of the accused Russians are military intelligence officers.

 

The second category is people close to Trump who have run afoul of the law. Two of them, former national security advisor Michael T. Flynn and former campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos, have pleaded guilty to lying to investigators.

 

Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was convicted of tax evasion and bank fraud. He faces a second trial this month on related charges. Manafort’s former deputy, Rick Gates, pleaded guilty to false statements and conspiracy, then testified against him.

Why is Manafort being prosecuted for financial crimes? What does that have to do with Russia and the election?

 

The charges aren’t related to the presidential campaign. Mueller began probing Manafort because of his connections to Russian interests, particularly the pro-Kremlin political party in Ukraine that he advised. But Mueller was also authorized to investigate “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.” A federal judge declined to throw out the charges against Manafort when defense lawyers argued that the special counsel had overstepped his authority.

You forgot Michael Cohen. What’s going on with him? Does that have anything to do with Russia?

 

Trump’s former personal lawyer pleaded guilty to tax evasion, bank fraud and campaign finance violations. The case started with Mueller, but he referred it to federal prosecutors in New York. The charges don’t involve Russia, but Cohen directly implicated the president in a criminal scheme. He told the court that Trump directed him to arrange $280,000 in hush money payments to two women shortly before the 2016 election, violating the law because the money was intended to serve a political purpose, wasn’t disclosed and exceeded contribution limits.

So none of the charges against Trump allies have anything to do with Russia?

 

It’s not that clear cut. Some of the charges are related to Russia even though they don’t allege that specific acts were taken during the presidential campaign.

 

Could Trump be charged with a crime?

 

It’s unlikely. Justice Department guidelines say a president cannot be indicted while in office, and there are no signs that Mueller — who technically works for the department even though he functions more like an independent prosecutor — is considering overruling that.

So that’s it? No matter what he did, the president doesn’t face any legal threat?

 

Trump isn’t invulnerable, but he doesn’t face the same kind of exposure as an average citizen. Mueller has the option to write a report on his findings and present it to Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel’s work. The report could be made public or presented to Congress at that point.

 

If the report includes strong evidence of wrongdoing by the president, there could be political repercussions. Congress could hold hearings or even try to impeach Trump, a step that becomes more likely if Democrats win back control of the U.S. House in this year’s midterm elections.

 

Voters also have the final say. If they don’t like what they’ve learned about Trump’s actions or his associates, they can vote him out of office in 2020.

more:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-russia-investigation-qa-20180830-story.html

Anonymous ID: ae96af Aug. 31, 2018, 9:49 a.m. No.2817611   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2817461

Leave Jeff Sessions alone

By The Times Editorial Board

Aug 30, 2018 | 4:10 AM

 

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-sessions-20180830-story.html