Anonymous ID: df10ef Aug. 31, 2018, 9:38 a.m. No.2817411   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2817286

>Does anyone bother to read the sauce?

 

>What are the odds the DOJ or Mueller have begun an investigation of Bruce Ohr for violating 18 USC sec. 208? Thatโ€™s a federal felony unless he disclosed all facts to the DOJ and has a written waiver. How many of you know what that is?

 

Do you really think the DOJ&FBI, or Congress for that matter, are going to get ANYTHING done regarding this? NO! These are all optics. No one is getting anything done and everyone is screaming at each other. Where will all of this be tried and finalized?

 

After Jan 1st shit it going to hit the FAN.

 

January 1, 2019

"Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law."

Anonymous ID: df10ef Aug. 31, 2018, 9:47 a.m. No.2817582   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2817461

DOJ&FBI cannot do their job blah blah blah. Who will do it for them? With the request from whom?

 

January 1, 2019

"Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law."