>>2817679 (pb)
>Since when is trusting a duly appointed individual with a positive history a trap?
Because they must know that Q has always told us to trust Sessions. Are they really so stupid?
>>2817679 (pb)
>Since when is trusting a duly appointed individual with a positive history a trap?
Because they must know that Q has always told us to trust Sessions. Are they really so stupid?
>Did the OLD GUARD 'learn' from this mistake (2016 election) and now tasking all new platforms [networks] to censor?
Seems blatantly obvious, doesn't it?