It does make sense that Mueller would be working on our side. The media obviously can't say "don't trust Mueller because he's not going after Trump, he's really helping Sessions go after crimes of the DNC." Crimes? what crimes? let's hear more.

So they have to say trust Mueller since he was hired to go after Trump. Then Mueller will pull through.

I just don't see how they stocked the team with dems and kept adding staff, with Mueller himself having a corrupt past, while genuinely helping MAGA, not leaking to the press, and so forth.

>>2817731

Right, but what gave them a sudden change of heart? Fear of prosecution, money to flip? You'd think at least one would've tried to sabotage it by leaking.

>>2817757

>>2817801

Every time events start accelerating and pressure builds, a change of narrative derails it. Maybe the MSM will cry obstruction of justice committed by Trump against Mueller. Then we'll need hearings or a special counsel for that.

>>2817900

I'm pretty sure that is a big reason Trump held so many powerful election rallies, to fire us up to vote in the face of point 1. I believed point 2 as long as there was no election fraud, but point 1 combined with a rally-inspired point 2 got people to vote because it became a winnable fight.

>>2818146

Public figures and corporations are held to a different standard for libel. It's more difficult for the public figure to sue for libel than an average person. The person suing must show that the person who wrote the info had malice and knew that the info was untrue.

>>2818335

Is that true about Trump offering to buy the fireworks?