This -might- have something:
http: //www.wral.com/fake-news-app-will-help-state-of-the-union-viewers-sort-out-fact-fiction/17301125/
article also mentions Alexa "Share the Facts"
This anon has neither an iPhone nor Alexa
This -might- have something:
http: //www.wral.com/fake-news-app-will-help-state-of-the-union-viewers-sort-out-fact-fiction/17301125/
article also mentions Alexa "Share the Facts"
This anon has neither an iPhone nor Alexa
Guys, Fednet only manages the videos–they sold the rights to CQ in 2007. I think you need to access them via CQ.com
You wouldn't be "casting discredit or dishonor" on a member of the House–all you would be doing is shining a light on it.
If someone is threatening to "shoot the President," I'm sure an exception would be made.
That's good to know–it means that Getty should have the unedited version.
"Standing" is a legal term–it means that you have some legal interest in the matter. For instance, if someone is suing you but they really haven't proven that they have a right to do so (through a signed contract, for instance), you can attack their "standing," and the case can get thrown out.
It happens a lot with robo-lawsuits: corporations will sue people that don't respond, and therefore cannot attack the standing of the suing entity even though it is poorly (or not) established. They lose automatically.
do tell, richfag