dChan
Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:48 p.m. No.282406   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>281941

I DO shoot large fine for myself, but..if I'm being paid I shoot in RAW so I have as much "info" to work with as possible should I need to do some work on an otherwise outstanding photo. It IS a pain in the ass...and honestly I don't know if I'd bother shooting RAW in THIS situation...but for some jobs RAW is the best way to make sure you've got ALL the data and have plenty to work with.

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:56 p.m. No.282494   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2622 >>2639

>>282019

 

That would be my guess...and we'll not find the RAW online...but if he altered the text (which we may be able to prove) then he did sum ting wong...

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 8:59 p.m. No.282532   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282046

Especially if he shoots mostly in RAW those files take up a LOT of space on a computer...cloud storage...p@ssword!

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:20 p.m. No.282764   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282298

THIS is textmessaging for sure..HIS message is dark blue, his sendee is gray/blue. Area appears to be right size to fit "trump should be shot" but wild speculation without proof...

 

(still trying to catch up)

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:36 p.m. No.282929   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282511

KEK….

 

but in reality..she was composing her rebuttal to the speech which eventually ended up on twatter. The photo is clearly shooped, but do we really believe the shooped part said "Trump should be shot?" She apparently left that bit out for twatter.

 

Are we sniffing the wrong ass here? It's illogical that "Trump should be shot" would be in her twatter rebutal.

 

This does indeed look like she's emailing someone..staff to post on twatter? (Thanks blowupfag, this one is easy to see)…

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:41 p.m. No.282954   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2965 >>2972 >>2983

>>282517

OK find the FILM not the capture…let's work with that.

 

Capture (hopefully Q is not a SRSLY oldfag) would mean screen shot..a capture from a video…right? So he's telling us to find the ORIGINAL FILM that something was screen shot from..but thus far we've zero luck with the video files.

 

We've established the photographer was shooting STILLS in RAW format. RAW as far as I know is not hosted anywhere on the net, and even emailing a RAW file is impossible with servers like Yahoo (perhaps paid emails would let you).

 

EVEN IF we found a RAW file or the photog gave it up, it takes special software (photoshop, or camera specific software) to read that file.

 

I don't think Q is telling us to find a file format no one can use without altering…what are we missing here?

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:45 p.m. No.282982   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282556

What MIGHT have happened is that she was indeed composing her response to SOTUA…in ONE shot…and that shot was used to cover up what was on her phone in another? a C&P so to speak?

 

It is illogical that she was composing a twatter to send to staff to post…that included "TRUMP SHOULD BE SHOT"….

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:51 p.m. No.283029   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282604

OK…walk with me on this…a film the Fourth is about a Spanish priest sucking boy dick. There is literally nothing IN that film that is relevant..we all know priests suck boy dick and we all know about rituals in the woods…this is nothing new, to ANYONE in the entire world by this time (movie is from 2007).

 

Unless that film has Aschiff sucking boy dick or any other person relevant to our CURRENT situation, you're literally wasting our time.

 

PLZ watch film, take notes. Should you spot something we don't already know, report back. TIA. Otherwise SRSLY, STFU.

Anonymous ID: 9fa382 Feb. 5, 2018, 9:54 p.m. No.283052   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>282515

>Board Owner

I did learn a lot about anal prolapse. I could probably have lived the rest of my life not knowing that..so thanks. It was equal to one man…one jar…kind of thing.