Background: In part one of this assessment, I wrote, “If the defiled-bed narrative in the Steele dossier is, indeed, a reconstitution of the narrative that motivated the Anwar [Ibrahim] case, the consequences are not just that the Steele Dossier was cribbed from another case and thus cannot be true, but that those who inserted the story are guilty of a grievous offense, whose yolk was formed by corruption on a scale unknown in the history of presidential politics in America.” The criticality of the Steele dossier to the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation cannot be overstated.
Hollywood constantly reuses and repurposes storylines. Why? Because they worked before. Those who do not understand literature often believe that an original plotline is the supreme creation of fiction. It is not; the depiction of character is the acme of writing. Of William Shakespeare’s thirty-nine plays, only three were built upon original plotlines, and two of these three were either written at the request of Queen Elizabeth or written for a performance that she was to attend. It was a depravity of character that both the Anwar and the Trump narratives were designed to convey; their assembly, in each case, almost certainly relied on proven parts.
https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/08/evolution-of-the-russian-collusion-narrative-%e2%94%80-part-two/