>>2844010

>If they are operating on US soil and citizens then there's basically a lack of oversight.

• OR - A deliberate intent to ignore what are supposed to be "The Rules", and use said agency's infrastructure for nefarious purposes to expand personal gain with no regard for the agency's initial and designed purpose.

This second option is far more likely, imo. There would in fact be MORE oversight required to keep all of the dancing minions in line and quiet.

>an agency has to have a mandate, otherwise why not just have one agency to do everything?

See above.

>>2844301

Only part of the cover-up.

Had you just lost one loved one to the Cabal, would you be willing to risk another?

When faced with deep state threats, how do think most normies would respond?

You are surrounded by the results of the answer. Think Logically.

>>2844297

Who is the clown on the right? Don't recognize him.

>>2844274

>why would Kissinger be at the service. He didn't attend Tedd Kennedy's service.

Ted Kennedy was not the Globe Trotting War monger than McStain was. He debatably was every bit the dick as JohnBoy, but he was not as successful on a global scale.