I'm not going into any more detail, sorry.
George Foreman was a bad ass fighter… Seems like a pleasant character to interact with in his later years..
Their symbolism will be their downfall.
Diana was one of the 'chosen' that didn't drink the koolaid when she learned the truth.
I saw all of that in RT as a kid; it was completely obvious that Diana had learned something she didn't like prior to her death because the tabloid paprazzi went nuts in a way reminiscent of the shills here…
Then she was dead. The way it all played out felt like a forced script change.
Historically in church doctrinje, there was ''more than one commission''
Everyone talks about the commission of St Peter, first "bishop of rome"
Nobody talks about the Church of James the Just (Jesus' brother James), in Jerusalem.
So why did Peter's congregation end up as the stanic monstrsity that it is, while the congregation of Jesus' fucking brother left to languish as a hole in the wall church in the sand?
This isn't a coincidence. And also, just a reminder that Peter denied Jesus thrice before He was crucified. So he was comped.
>Jesus' family saw Paul of Tarsus (author of so many of those 'epistles' mainstream Christians like to quote) for the imposter (and loyal Roman pagan agent) that he was…
Saul was an og clown.
Well, if you want to speak in truths, you need to look past the "biblical truths" of Bibles and learn sumerian and proto- egyptian.
The bibles are great archetypes of far older stories. It doesn't make the Bibles any less valid.
It's no different than discerning the facts for yourself, today.
>but it presumes that MATTIS is indeed a white hat, who is part of THE PLAN.
Mattis is a Marine. He answers directly to the Constitution, and nothing else.
>>2844864'
>Dude, I'm a writer and historian. I've written on Abraham. I teach classes. I have a new book coming out on the early church and it's emergence from the Abrahamic Covenant.
Your appeal to authority means nothing here.
>I can speak on the questions you asked to provide clarity.
Great, I only asked one: "So why did Peter's congregation end up as the stanic monstrsity that it is, while the congregation of Jesus' fucking brother left to languish as a hole in the wall church in the sand?"
The truth is, the Bibles have been re-written and re-translated from sources that are not even Aramaic… That you might as well be reading the epic of Gilgamesh and calling it a bible, too.
Hurr, durr, the local language of JC/the original 12 was Aramaic.
Not Greek.
Not Latin.
The Romans were invaders, the locals would never use Latin to interact with or write to each other. Especially so, since at that time the locals hated the Romans.
And what we know in modern times as "The Bible"… Started out as a pile of scrolls' and letters. translated from aramaic to reek and latin by non aramaic speakers, decades (in cases centuries) after the fact..
Because the Jesus movement was as underground as any modern movement [they] hate, today.
Mattis and Kelly were both heavily asserting in that exchange. If there was a Van de Graaff machine there it would have been epic.