Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 9:43 a.m. No.2846112   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6204

Is any human willing to try to defend BO's obvious subversive inclusion of extensive "CP warnings" at the head of every bread? We know BO can't and won't defend it coherently, because its algorithms are inadequate to the task. But if there are humans that still post here, and take the mission seriously— obviously BO is undermining us FLAGRANTLY with this shit… unless an actual patriotic anon would like to offer an argument to the contrary?

 

>>2829643, >>2829673 1986 U.S. District Court Dost test: No CP image guidelines

 

It's a fucking joke. And BO has made it perfectly obvious that IT'S A FUCKING CIA BOT… so will humans ever wake up and take control of this movement, or what?

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:06 a.m. No.2846308   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6341 >>6396

"Sunday frens addition"

 

Why do the FUCKING BOT bakers keep recycling stale lingo? Idiot bots always out themselves, in so many ways.

 

Why is this board controlled by AI? Where is the AI coming from? Why doesn't Q say anything about it? Why doesn't any human anon make a new board?

 

Just food for thought.

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:13 a.m. No.2846375   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>2846341

New bot tactics in response, I see.

 

This post is absolute nonsense. This board is controlled and dominated by bots. That is the issue, and it is definitive. The board is nothing but a fast moving stream of bullshit that Q posts into, and from which something of use may occasionally float to the top. It could be MUCH MUCH MORE… but we have remained stuck under the relentless boot of the bot system.

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:16 a.m. No.2846393   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6409 >>6411 >>6437 >>6508

>>2846374

For example "GermanArchiveAnon" is almost certainly fake– saying that without even looking at any of its posts, just based on the fact that all the named, branded, repeating, consistent "anons" on this board tend to be fake. Like all the bakers, BO, and the BVs, such as they are.

 

Think about it: BO PRETENDS that this is some generic chan board that he's just owning for shits and giggles, apparently. Doesn't make ANY effort to make the board ready for newcomers– WHICH Q EXPLICITLY SUGGESTED BE DONE… Why? Why do humans passively accept what is clearly a comped situation? I have been pounding away at this question for months, and it's like running in quick sand. It's not subtle how much fakery there is… Where are the humans?

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:18 a.m. No.2846411   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>2846393

If we can accept the laughable idea that this fake, undermining, passive (except for fake CP WARNINGS, which he defends to the death!) BO is for some reason the "person" that made a board for Q– then why don't we get a new one with a BO THAT ACTUALLY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT THE MISSION? Let BO go back to leading the fake, generic chan lifestyle he portrays clumsily here, and let a patriot that will get a good crew of BVs own the board. We can clean up TONS of shit. We would have neat, inviting information. We are being BLOWN OUT by the bot system, humans. It saddens me. Saddens and frustrates.

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:23 a.m. No.2846447   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6491

>>2846433

>>2846380

 

Look at how pathetically fake this shit is! The horrid, anti-POTUS propaganda bot posts one of its repetitive nonsense things it posts, and another bot pretends it's "a funny joke"… It's amazingly stupid. Why can't we get a board that isn't controlled by a CIA bot BO, so we can at least delete the bullshit?

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:31 a.m. No.2846554   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6620

>>2846457

>Ezra Cohen-Watnick

So, this Ezra wields enormous power, for a mysterious reason. Unmovable from his position… what power is backing that up and keeping him there? What power does he serve?

Does he oversee some kind of profound blackmail entanglement that POTUS inherited, that is at the heart of everything? And is, perhaps, this same sort of thing what keeps Q from being able to speak out about bot BO here?

Anonymous ID: 7fde28 Sept. 2, 2018, 10:42 a.m. No.2846722   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6802

>>2846682

The only problem is, if you go down a couple more layers of deception/complexity, any public facts we see could all be a ruse. If you go there (to supposing there may be deeper deception than appears, which I can't say should or should not be considered.