>>2847123

Is it possible to somehow make a post about the fraternities, who was in them and when?

Then connect them all?

No?

>>2847143

How would we find the files on that?

I remind you that those guys are oldfarts from before the pc was in use.

How do we find those papers?

It must be stores somewhere..

Library?

Uni?

>>2847166

First we needs

1. Names

1.2 Classes

2; What school

3.What year

firstly.

Who can dig this up?

wee need a names list.

This would actually work on its own bread.

Im going to put this out for a mission for those who are interested.

This is a intel gathering thing.

A big picture thing.

We are going to need

1. Schools

2. What classes

3. What degrees

4. Fraterneties

5. Year

OF those people

1. George W. Bush

2. Hussein

3. Sessions

4. HRC

5. Jeb Bush

6. Ztrock

7. McCain

8. Donald Trump

Find the papers on the fraterneties and we probable find them all and it goes on from there.

Then we connect the dots and make a nice short video and lining it all nicely up.

Who is up for some work tonight?

https://truepundit.com/dnc-chief-denies-she-was-at-hospital-night-of-seth-rich-murder-then-metro-police-drop-the-hammer-on-dem-leader/

>>2847481

If you watch the purse.. It is way lower than the hands.

Below her waist.

He could not put anything in it. He would have to throw it in there.

Not likely.

Git gud or gtfo

>>2847502

There is nodes at some point in time.

Gotta find them.

>>2847540

My bad

>>2847290

Case closed.

Nothing to see here.

>>2847560

All the body language suggest this is indeed a passing of something other than gum.

They are nervous while it is in transit and dont relax after it is safe in BOTH hands of MO.

And the does a famous "dice" roll on it right after to either get a better grip OR turn it to see something.

Just a friendly reminder anons..

We follow protocols to get a more structured debate.

If this is followed we get a much more precise debate and breads are filled with actual information.

I present..

"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] The terms ad mulierem[3] and ad feminam[4] have been used specifically when the person receiving the criticism is female."