>>2848193 (pb)

This was the original definition of "metadata". It drove the courts and legal profession crazy when e-pleading and e-discovery first began as the recipient(s) had access to the most sensitive information either vital or mortal, or anywhere in between, on your/their cases. Many cases of malpractice were brought and won. At first, everyone tried to add covering disclaimers "Any and All Metadata Enclosed Are Hereby Subject To Attorney-Client or Work Privilege" but everyone at least LOOKED at the metadata before giving it back. The stuff of nightmares for attorneys on the hamster wheel.

What is Q getting at besides the trick that Comey and others were using by sending emails in the "drafts" of a person's original email. Say Comey has an email account, writes a message and saves it to draft. Person B [C, D, E, F, …] is given the PW for Comey's email account and reads the "draft" and creates another response again saved to "draft". No actual emails are SENT but they all talk to each other via drafts on the same account. Forgive me if I'm preaching old news here but is there something else other than this cute gimmick which Q is pointing us to? Other than doing the same thing with "hidden" metadata in electronic files?

>>2848630

His entire Arizona Fortress along with other assets should be subject to civil forfeiture. "Not on his terms".