Is it possible that Beatty was using speech to text on her phone, so the audio was picked up and converted to text?
forget what i said about speech to text…
most likely scenario = >>285001
you're correct
some Morning After thoughts…Beatty is the one who RECEIVED the message, but, who SENT it? Also, was it in reply to something that she sent to the sender (previous or ongoing conversation), or was it unprompted?
Either way, the SENDER of the text message, THAT is the primary person of interest here. It's not a crime to receive said text of a threat, although it would be a crime to NOT report it. Or, did she? (doubt it)
the New Message is an email that she's typing in reply to the SOTU speech, not the missing text message (line 4) overlaying the email
Precisely!
I know that we want to think that they are complete idiots, we may not have to go THAT far though to prove it.
Yes, know who she is (I referenced as Beatty). It's already been determined that the text there is an email, not a text message. Completed statement @ https:// beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-statement-on-trumps-first-state-of-the-union-address . If she "was" sent this speech, then why is it labeled as New Message, instead of having a subject line or (No Subject)? Looks like it's being typed up in the moment, when a text message came in to overlay it.