>>2836392 (pb)
>>2836385 (pb)
>>2835583 (pb)
>>2835480 (pb)
Don't have the time to listen H's message.
The mirroring part others brought up I accept
However anon quoted this
"Hussein:
John understood, as JFK understood, Ronald Regan understood, that part of what makes our country great, is that our membership is based, not on our bloodline, (pause) not on what we look like, not on what our last name..s are, not based on where our parents our grandparents came from, or how recently they arrived, but on adherence to a common creed: that all of us are created equal, endowed by our creator, with certain unalienable rights."
which to me is obviously his Apologia for himself, for his "Presidency" [though would only work for people who did not realize how deep his crimes go]
Membership is based not on bloodline
[could be meaning with mention of blood?]
But really no one knows [per documentation] Hussain's parantage, it's apparent though his Dad was an Indonesia cult leader involved with both the C-A and the English Intel [MI - x]? (Those two allegedly separate orgs may be the same , by now.)
"Anyway "Parantage" "Bloodline" doesn't matter. " Apologia for himself.
"not on what we look like"
Dude doesn't even resemble an African - American. (shouldn't the first U.S. Pres. who's "black" be an actual African - American? whose family history goes back deep and who actually worked to build the country?]
"not on what our last name..s are"
Right, because his is fraudulent
"not based on where our parents our grandparents came from,"
That would be a mystery in his case?
"or how recently they arrived"
This is a lie :
If they person arrived yesterday they are not a citizen, and do not have the same rights here, Sorry Barry.
"but on adherence to a common creed: that all of us are created equal, endowed by our creator, with certain unalienable rights."
This "right" word here flirts with a communistic interpretation, in that he leaves out what are those rights "everybody" should have:
Does "everybody" have a right to our personal property? Under what conditions can a person's rights be negotiable?
Remember it's been ruled that Corporations are persons.
Hussain leaves it open for interpretation. Hussain is hypocritical, since when he kills a politcal enemy, hires someone to do that or orders their plane downed, what happened to those victim's rights?
But we knew he was a liar, for many years.
Why did McCursed help Hussain destroy the Tea Party?
(And this is all something I didn't read anyone else write, but I can't keep up so, whatever)