>>2857664

>Queen of Hearts

If anyone saw and remembers the interview Diana gave on TV shortly before she left the stage?, she named herself "Queen of Hearts" instead, while saying she would never become "Queen" of England

The interview is also noteworthy since she stated that as soon as What's his name, her husband, saw her second son, the marriage was in fact over.

Remember it was the husband Charlie, who introduced her to lover, Hewitt, since she was an impediment to his visits with his mistress, so in was in his own interest that he introduced her to the man who bacame her second son's father

Charlie went ahead and married mistress after getting rid of Diana

It's said you can't get that interview, Nov. '95, BBC

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/witness/november/20/newsid_4407000/4407752.stm

1995: 'Queen of hearts' reveals affair

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/325244404312711466/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Hearts

Like Kings of yore, beheading the wives they needed to get rid of in order to re-marry

>>2857835

In the background to the right, see the "Queen of Hearts" from the Alice book. who would always scream "Off with their head"

So That could be ? someone beside Hillary? HRC was mind control victim.

I find that hard to believe. She was psycho from childhood?

Likely not a good idea to name yourself. When Diana named herself "Queen of Heart" it was distinguish herself from the relatives.

"Queen of Hearts" in the book - how "Queen" was depicted, was obviously an ironic reference to "Royals"

>>2857854

>>2857858

If they need to they will falsify the audio record, Tech for that was available 20 years ago.

Kurzweil

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurzweil_Music_Systems

The right audio engineer can speak through the synth and have it come out as any voice he has a sample of.

Cuts both ways, Since real recordings can be discredited with this information.

Clinton's reputation with the public is fair? No, her employees have been lying about her for decades.

>>2857940

rabbit there looks super-creepy and with a hard-on?

>>2857833

2857855

Towers weren't brought down by conventional explosives, that Cointelpro's line

Conintelpro has control of "9/11 Truth Movement" so not surprising that would be posted here.

Info on Ted Kennedy would be interesting to me since I believe he was killed deliberately by Hussain, after endorsement for Hussain Presidency, since traitor who became ~President didn't want to keep his part of the bargain with Edward Kennedy regarding health care policy.

>>2857999

>>2857948

PASTeur

PASSeur

Payseur ?

Was the discovery of germs weaponized all along?

>>2857948

Notable Baker

#2857948 Zika virus connection to tropical Rio

>>2857786

>>2857786

It could be.

Argument "well they wouldn't do this or that" leave paperwork, unclaimed body if it were true, is not a good argument.

Paperwork,, does slip through

Unclaimed body - If they were planning a substitution for Intel purposed, it wouldn't be necessary to claim it. If fact, they would most likely have to abandon it, for the subterfuge.

Also, evidence of the photo

If you look closer it doens't completely match the person we "know" as "No Name"

Perhaps that's why "he's" "No Name

>>2858023

Who has time to clean their room and keep on top of this research?

>>2858188

>>2858188

Thank you for your report anon.

>>2858222

>>2858180

photoshop job very bad one too

look at the "Head of Huma"

Hair on one side of part bleeds to Graham's forehead

Bad photoshop added to images to discredit?

>>2858252

Was taken off a YouTube screen shot so could be electrical interference?

Does anyone deny the filming of the ceremony as being in general accurate?

>>2858290

They are laughing becasue passing notes. And still think they are winning.

Look at Barry smirk.

My he looks thin. Lost his appetite?

>>2858280

This image is a disguise?

Here with beard of Strzok

>>2858319

Argument is fake

"They are stupid"

remember?

>>2858331

Yes, I believe SpaceX 37 is a weapon.

No sure how that would kill No Name though

>>2858336

No they are real human beings, who been abused and severely betrayed for many years; maybe centuries.

We all are.

>>2858210

>>2858311

I don't think she did the real tears though

Typical crisis actor, not a pro.

as far s this frontpage still shot of the Post?

No tears.

You guys know what to do to finish this meme.