>>2858500 lb

The one thing that I suppose is possible is that some of the crimes may have occurred in Utah.

Could their spying crimes (on Trump) be prosecuted in Utah if it involves NSA server’s data collected and stored in Utah?

Could their U1 crimes be prosecuted in Utah if it involves Uranium which was mined in Utah or transported from Utah?

Could their child trafficking crimes be prosecuted in Utah if the children were trafficked through Utah or the traffickers hub was in Utah?

I think it has more to do with the NSA servers being in Utah and the spying crimes involved the server in Utah. Q is making the point that Sessions could have chosen a prosecutor from just about any conservative state, but he chose Utah because of the NSA data collection is there.

>>2858618

too much of a risk for scandal for POTUS if the good guys whisked an old man to Gitmo.

NOthing would take Trump down faster that a story like this getting out before any body is arrested or convicted.

And since everybody is watching this site, you can bet that if it happened that way, (((they))) would get the story one way or another.

The chain of custody was to [cindy] from talking.

Do you think she was in the SCIF?

>>2858700

But where will the indictments be prosecuted?

>>2858748

But why did they pick an Obama appointee out of Utah?

Why not Texas, Mississippi, Kansas?

Plenty of federal prosecutors in those red states,

The one reason Q is directing us to is the NSA servers.

No servers in TX or MI or KS

The servers are important for getting evidence and guilty verdicts.

Maybe by illegally using those servers, the crimes were committed in Utah , too!!

Maybe they sent people to Utah to commit those crimes.