I have an honest question for you all who still "trust sessions."

Based on Q's suggestions, you say that Trump talks shit about Sessions on twitter and elsewhere to create space between them, to create the illusion that they haven't been working together. Therefore when the prosecutions happen, it will look like they are independent of Trump, the product of an independent DOJ. Ok fine. Well there seems to be a major problem to me with that theory. Now that Trump has been publicly bashing Sessions for not going after the left and deep state, what will it look like if Sessions actually drops the hammer? It will look like he was pressured to do so from Trump's very public pressure that he put on him, and that he simply caved to Trump's demands. Can you erudite masters of logic explain how that is better? Thanks.

I'm repeating this post because it got lost in the garbage that is put at the top of every thread for no reason, that no one ever reads, that could simply be put it a separate place in the catalog. But I digress…

I have an honest question for you all who still "trust sessions."

Based on Q's suggestions, you say that Trump talks shit about Sessions on twitter and elsewhere to create space between them, to create the illusion that they haven't been working together. Therefore when the prosecutions happen, it will look like they are independent of Trump, the product of an independent DOJ. Ok fine. Well there seems to be a major problem to me with that theory. Now that Trump has been publicly bashing Sessions for not going after the left and deep state, what will it look like if Sessions actually drops the hammer? It will look like he was pressured to do so from Trump's very public pressure that he put on him, and that he simply caved to Trump's demands. Can you erudite masters of logic explain how that is better? Thanks.

>>2860923

Maybe he hasn't fired Sessions because he has no other options. The traitorous congress would never confirm an aggressive, uncompromised prosecutor loyal to Trump. The only new head of DOJ that could be confirmed would be a deep state plant. Therefore, Trump keeps Sessions around. Sessions may be weak, senile, and stupid, but he isn't an outright traitor, so it is the best option Trump has at the moment. Trump would like for Sessions to do something, anything, before the midterms, and he wants to publicize that there are crimes of the deep state that could be prosecuted if Sessions did his job. So he bashes him publicly. Seems more logical to me.

>>2860968

In what way is your comment relevant to my point about Sessions?

>>2860978

Yeah I'm sure the media will go with the narrative that Sessions was "finally compelled by the evidence" rather than finally compelled by Trump's non-stop pressure. The point is the narrative will be that Sessions is being forced by Trump to do his bidding. The narrative will be the same if Sessions does anything, no matter when it might happen. Therefore, it may have been worth starting something before 2 years of the presidency have gone by and the midterms are around the corner. Therefore, it may be that your theory is wrong, and that nothing will happen, and that Q is full of shit. I can keep up just fine with your strain of logic. I just think it is full of holes. Like the rest of Q's predictions that end up being proved false or never come true when they are promised.

>>2861043

Ok, well lets assume you are correct and it is a master plan. When do you suppose would be a good time to actually do something? Will you still believe after the Dems retake control of the house in November, 2 months from now? The presidency is a quarter of the way through. At what point will you actually expect Q to deliver on his biblical promises?