>>2866144

Thank you for your concern about my safety my anonymous friend, however it's important I remain identifiable. In-fact, I would argue I put myself into more danger if I cannot be identified (it's easier for my writings to be buried if I'm anonymous, and if they can be buried, I can be potentially dispatched without anyone noticing).

My tripcode 'name' is a compromise between my usual habit of using my real name (like I do in many forums and boards) and not causing anons too much worry about DOXing myself. Tripcodes don't work on this board unless they're Q's, so my publishing it to the name field is intentional.

As far as my safety goes, there's already a microwave weapon setup against me outside, and I've already had several attempts by the likes of the FBI (ever famed for their corruption) to try to trick me into committing one crime or another or to leave my jurisdiction where the 'lying to an FBI agent' would no doubt be pulled (they either make you drunk or inject you with drugs - doesn't matter what you say, incoherent shit can be lying to an FBI agent too).

I'm already 'known', you might say. Using a name makes my writings searchable and harder to bury. A refuge in audacity, you might say.

Pretend the name doesn't exist. It's basically a tripcode anyway.

>>2870002

I double-checked, but it's not a typo. The codename for the agent they ordered a hit on is "Whitecat" and not 'whitehat'.

Given the colour-animal combination, this is classically an agency codename (I would, however this is a total guess on a limb, say it's a CIA codename). It might tie in with the "white rabbits" and "hatter" and "alice" type shit, although those don't follow the standard naming convention (the latter seems like amateur hour on codenames).

What we need to do is identify when this email was sent. That gives us a 'latest possible date' for the hit, then we can date range backwards and look for suspicious murders.

Another total guess, but please don't jump on this simply because it fits the narrative we want to hear - what if "Whitecat" was Seth Rich?

We'd need to prove it, though.

MS13 ordered hit?

>>2862999

Note the date Blackheath raises his concerns about a $15 trillion dollar fraud. 2012 - back when both Obama and David Cameron were in power.

"16 Feb 2012 : Column 1016"

And I quote:

"There are three possible conclusions which may come from it. First, there may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major Government who should know better. Effectively, it undermined the integrity of a British bank, the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second possibility is that a major American department has an agency which has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which it is seeking to get at least €50 billion as a pay-off. The third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud, which has not been carried out, but which has been prepared to provide a threat to one Government or more if they do not make a pay-off. These three possibilities need an urgent review."

And look who is involved?

HSBC.

Who was involved with HSBC?

James Comey.

What are HSBC famed for?

Money laundering for criminal gangs (Colombia etc).

[The world's local criminal bank]

"In April and May 2009, the situation started with the alleged transfer of $5 trillion to HSBC in the United Kingdom. Seven days later, another $5 trillion came to HSBC and three weeks later another $5 trillion. A total of $15 trillion is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland. We need to look to where this came from and the history of this money. I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and where it has come from for a long time."

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201212/ldhansrd/text/120216-0002.htm#12021643000172

2009 is one year after Obama took power.

James Comey appointed in 2013, 1 year after Blackheath raises his concerns of fraud involving HSBC transactions?

"James Brien Comey, Jr. (52), former United States Deputy Attorney General, has been appointed a Director of HSBC Holdings plc with effect from 4 March 2013. He will be an independent non-executive Director and a member of the Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee."

https://web.archive.org/web/20130407063402/http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight/2013/former-us-deputy-attorney-general-joins-hsbc-board

Apologies, Blackheath quote link missing:

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201212/ldhansrd/text/120216-0002.htm#12021643000172

He goes into additional detail, claims he has the original contract, is convinced it happened.

Digging into it, there's a discredit attempt to say the information is a scam, but no-one can explain why or go into much depth other than saying it's 'some sort of scam'.

From the link, Strathclyde reference - which ties in both the email and these declared events:

"Finally, I have a letter from Mr Riyadi himself, who tells me that he was put up to do this, that none of it is true, and that he has been robbed of all his money. I am quite prepared to recognise that one of the possibilities is that Mr Riyadi is himself putting this together as a forgery in order to try to win some recovery. But it gets more complicated than that because each of the $5 trillion payments that came in has been acknowledged and receipted by senior executives at HSBC and again receipted by senior executives at the Royal Bank of Scotland. I have a set of receipts for all of this money. Why would any bank want to file $5 trillion-worth-$15 trillion in total-of receipts if the money did not exist? The money was first said to have come from the Riyadi account to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and from there it was passed to JP MorganChase in New York for onward transit to London. The means of sending it was a SWIFT note which, if it was genuine, ought to have been registered with the Bank of England.

When this came about, I took it to my noble friend Lord Strathclyde and asked what we should do with it."

No wonder, per the email, Strathclyde called Priest's agent:

"The CIA informed me of President Obama's visist to the UK Prime Minister David Cameron in 2011 in regards to this incident, and the 15Trillion USD SWIFT's, see attached. Lord Stratclyde who was at the time the boss of the House of Lords under Cameron called my agent, Lord David James into an urgent meeting the day after the two power brokers met:

Lord James was told in regards to the content of this email, "You are now interfering with the highest level of British Security Since WW2"."

By British security… they meant a massive securities fraud involving the Bank of England?

For Americans outside the loop, Lord James is none other than…

Lord James of Blackheath.

These are documents relating to the Riyadi case, per

>>2868223

Excuse the pun: you were right on the money.

These explosive revelations could take down the Federal Reserve, or even the Bank of England.

There's a tie-in here with my own research in TTDDTOT (which involved a hit on a Croatian journalist).

There's an uploaded scanned copy of the Riyadi case found here:

http://etleboro.com/documents/copy-title.pdf

Which is hosted in Serbia. Which won't mean much until you tie in my TTDDTOT research where I was hunting down ties from Hillary's Hatter, AKA Marty Torrey. He shared a company called Global Partnerships Incorporated with a guy called Ratko Knezevic

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2562503.html#q2861136

Basically, he was connected with shady goings-on (a Serbian mafia) and the hit was purportedly for 1.5 million euros.

Tie-in with this case? Given the document is hosted in the Serbian Republic.