>>2945724

Your entire refutation is based on other people telling you what to believe, and that's your response to mine? Pot and kettle.

Before us are documents, photographs, newspaper clippings, but sure, lets go with a Karl Popper argument of proving a negative. Your entire argument rests on the premise that an organisation is as of yet 'unproven' (to you). So?

Perhaps you could explain to us all why someone would waste so much time forging so many documents? What the intentions are? If your argument the White Dragon Society is a myth are true - you must follow through your conclusions in their entirety and declare everything here a fake, and ultimately justify why someone would release fakes (including, might I point out, passports with all of the security watermarks on them).

A losing argument for you to fight, yes?

>>2951714

>Interesting thing about the certificates is rhat Mr. H was not arrested for anything wrong except the investigators of a related investigation arrested him because "they thought" he possessed a forgery.

If they released him without charge, it means they couldn't prove the certificates were fake, which either suggests the police are incompetent, or that the certificates were indeed real.

Regardless, I've found a lead with the details you have extrapolated:

"Federal cases surrounding Beirut, Lebanon businessman Anthony Hamod ( of Sydney, Australia ) saw Australia Federal Police arrest him, keep him jailed for 9-months, afterwhich the Australia federal court released him and ordered the $170,000,000,000 billion dollar valued platinum bullion UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND ( UBS AG ) certificate of deposit ( CD ) be returned."

"- Anthony Hamod ( 1st Plaintiff )

• HAMOCK INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ( 2nd Plaintiff )

• State of New South Wales ( 1st Defendant )

• UBS AUSTRALIA LIMITED ( 2nd Defendant )"

"26. Mr Hamod’s affidavit is relatively long and difficult to summarise. It tells a remarkable and intriguing tale going back to June 1994 when Mr Hamod received the Certificate for security for costs and commissions said to have been earned by him for the supply of services for the sale of several other certificates held by PT GALAXY TRUST INDONESIA. Mr. Hamod said that in June 1994 he conducted a due diligence on the Certificate with Pierre Grumbacher, the clearance officer of the Second Defendant [ UBS AUSTRALIA LIMITED ] through ALFIMA TRUST Tand satisfied himself that the Certificate was authentic and valid and issued by the Second Defendant [ UBS AUSTRALIA LIMITED ] as a Bearer Certificate for a Deposit of Platinum."

Referral source:

http://sapphirecapital.proboards.com/thread/3998/ubs-bullion-certificates

Original source:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/supreme_ct/2007/1366.html

Archive.is throwing errors at me again, suggesting this information is, yet again, highly explosive. It's also worth noting whenever this happens, my HTTPS gets bumped down to HTTP… despite having HTTPS everywhere installed. Hello there NSA, how are you this fine morning?

…And my browser got totalled (and my clipboard wiped). Unluckily for them my browser keeps the last session in memory if it crashes. Nice try.

Tor also thwarts the little 'server error' trick with Archive.is.

Continuing on.

It appears after a court case in Australia, Anthony got his certificates accepted?

The amount of restrictions on testing the certificate, plus the insane amount of security suggest they took this certificate very seriously.

Given this man's location in 2007 lines up with our other individual's associations with Australia, we can be assured they are most likely the same man.

The case, further:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/supreme_ct/2007/1395.html

Looks like we have a lead.

Plenty of evidence this is indeed legitimate. We also have some additional insights into who Mr Anthony Hamod is, and where he's travelled to. The case also documents some of the… events he has experienced.

"10. Some examples of the documents are as follows. Exhibit AAT is a letter dated 6 January 1995 from HAMOCK INVESTMENTS PTY. LTD. to Nicholas Wall, above the signature of the first plaintiff. The subject matter of that letter is a proposed sale of the Platinum Certificate. The letter contains material suggesting that there may have been potential buyers for the certificate, inferentially supporting the proposition that the certificate is valid. The letter is inherently self-serving. It contains other representations that are arguably incapable of verification."

"13. Exhibit AAAE is a document of some 213 pages. It is not possible conveniently or accurately to summarise its contents in any meaningful way. Pages 133 and following of that document, however, are portion of a statement by an unnamed person apparently given to the Australia Federal Police in the course of an interview on September 20, 1995 in Vancouver, CANADA."

"14. Pages 19-21 of the same exhibit are a letter from the first [ 1st ] Plaintiff to federal agent Bishop of the Australia federal police, which contains, among other things, the following statement:"

"16. Exhibit AX is a document of 79 pages that also defies convenient or accurate description. Page one of that exhibit is a letter dated 11 March 1994 from HAMOD HOLDINGS PTY. LTD. to Michael Brendan O'Dowd. […]"

". . . [ COURT EDITED-OUT: Item # 55. & Item # 56. ] . . ."

"16. One of the matters that need to be incorporated in the present application is the fact that the plaintiffs are now and have for some considerable periods during the history of these proceedings been unrepresented by counsel and/or solicitor."

"Mr. Hamod also professes a less than perfect understanding of English."

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/supreme_ct/2008/967.html

https://indymedia.org/en/2008/06/908339.shtml

https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2008/06/401466.html

https://indymedia.org/en/2006/03/835443.shtml

Wow, the digging around this case got severely impeded. Archive.is errored even within Tor, and I found my entry node refused to change. After I forced a change in Tor's source country, my Tor browser wouldn't connect (blocked ISP level?).

I made use of Tor bridges to work around the ISP block, which worked, but after every successful archive.is archive it stopped working again. I burned through no less than three Tor bridges to archive the above, which eagle-eyed readers will note most couldn't even be archived directly.

I have never encountered resistance in archiving information to this level. It strikes me they're about a couple of stops away from just pulling my internet entirely. You'd be forgiven if you thought I lived in China, but alas, no… I am resident in the UK. What fun!